...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Production Science >Using fistulated sheep to compare in sacco and in vitro rumen degradation of selected feeds
【24h】

Using fistulated sheep to compare in sacco and in vitro rumen degradation of selected feeds

机译:使用f裂的绵羊比较选定饲料的糖囊和体外瘤胃降解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite its beneficial role in almost all feed evaluation systems, the in sacco method is inconsistent and labour intensive in estimating the degradation of ruminant feeds. This study compared a rumen fluid-based in vitro method with the in sacco method to estimate degradation of 12 feeds comprising six concentrates and six grasses representing three fields during two seasons of winter and spring. Three feed groups (n = 4) were formed by using two grasses (one per season) and two concentrates. These feeds were incubated alongside blanks, in duplicate, for various hours either in sacco in three fistulated sheep or in vitro by using rumen fluid from the same sheep over three periods using two separate 3 x 3 Latin square designs. The in sacco and in vitro data were statistically compared for the effects of sheep, feed group and period on degradation at each incubation time within each method. The degradation data were fitted exponentially to derive water soluble (a), insoluble (b) and degradation rate (c) constants to estimate effective degradability at rumen outflow rate of 0.02 (P-0.02) for each feed in each method. These values were statistically compared for variations within and between feed types for each method. The sheep, group and period did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) for feed degradation at most incubation times within any of these two methods. The in vitro method was able to mimic the in sacco degradation of feeds, although the absolute in vitro values were always lower than the in sacco values. The higher in sacco degradation for almost all feeds were partly attributed to the much greater losses of these feeds during their washing with water at 0 h. The in vitro method did identify significant differences (P < 0.05) in dry matter or crude protein degradations between and within different concentrates and grasses in parallel to the in sacco method. The ranking of feeds was comparable for these methods. The in vitro method can be used in parallel to the in sacco method to estimate degradation of various feeds. However, there is a need for coordinated studies to improve the prediction ability of the in vitro method for its adoption to routinely estimate the degradation of ruminant feeds.
机译:尽管in sacco方法在几乎所有饲料评估系统中都发挥了有益的作用,但在评估反刍动物饲料的降解方面却不一致且费力。这项研究将基于瘤胃液的体外方法与in sacco方法进行了比较,以估计在冬季和春季两个季节中代表三个田地的12种饲料(包括6种精矿和6种草)的降解。通过使用两种草(每季一种)和两种精矿来形成三个饲料组(n = 4)。将这些饲料与空白样品一起一式两份在三只有裂孔的绵羊的囊中或在体外使用两个相同的3 x 3拉丁方形设计,使用来自同一只绵羊的瘤胃液在三个时期内孵育多个小时。在每种方法的每个温育时间,对囊内和体外数据进行统计学比较,以比较绵羊,饲料组和时期对降解的影响。对降解数据进行指数拟合,得出每种方法中每种进料的水溶性(a),不溶性(b)和降解速率(c)常数,以估计瘤胃流出率为0.02(P-0.02)时的有效降解性。对每种方法的进料类型之间和进料类型之间的差异进行统计学比较。在这两种方法中的任何一个中,在大多数孵化时间内,绵羊,组和时期的饲料降解均没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。体外方法能够模拟饲料的囊内降解,尽管绝对体外值始终低于囊内值。几乎所有饲料的糖囊降解率都较高,部分归因于这些饲料在0 h用水洗涤期间损失更大。体外方法的确发现与精囊法平行的在不同浓缩物和草之间和之内的干物质或粗蛋白降解方面的显着差异(P <0.05)。对于这些方法,提要的排名是可比的。体外方法可与囊内方法并行使用,以评估各种饲料的降解。但是,需要进行协调的研究来提高体外方法的预测能力,以便采用该方法来常规评估反刍动物饲料的降解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号