首页> 外文期刊>Annals of hematology >Pegfilgrastim reduces the length of hospitalization and the time to engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with melphalan 200 and auto-SCT compared with filgrastim.
【24h】

Pegfilgrastim reduces the length of hospitalization and the time to engraftment in multiple myeloma patients treated with melphalan 200 and auto-SCT compared with filgrastim.

机译:与非格司亭相比,培格非司亭减少了用美法仑200和自体SCT治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的住院时间和移植时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To reduce the duration of neutropenia after conditioning chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (APBSCT), granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) are commonly administered. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of pegfilgrastim compared to filgrastim on neutrophil engraftment, hospital stay, and supportive measures in patients with multiple myeloma after conditioning with Melphalan 200 (Mel200) followed by APBSCT. Ninety-two APBSCT after Mel200 treatment were performed in 72 patients between January 2006 and December 2009 at our institution. Patients received either single-dose pegfilgrastim (n = 46; 50%), or daily filgrastim (n = 46; 50%) after APBSCT (median duration of filgrastim use, 9 days; range, 3-14 days). Duration of neutropenia grade IV was shorter with pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim (median, 5 days (range, 3-14 days) versus 6 days (range, 3-9 days), p = 0.0079). The length of hospitalization differed significantly (pegfilgrastim (median, 14.5 days; range, 11-47 days) versus filgrastim (median, 15.5 days; range, 12-64 days), p = 0.024). Pegfilgrastim-treated patients had less red blood cell transfusions (median, 0 transfusions (range, 0-10) versus 0.5 transfusions (range, 0-9), p = 0.00065). Pegfilgrastim was associated with reduced cost of the treatment procedure compared with filgrastim (p = 0.031). Pegfilgrastim appears to be at least equivalent to filgrastim without additional expenditure in myeloma patients treated with Mel200 and APBSCT.
机译:为了减少调理化疗和自体外周血干细胞移植(APBSCT)后中性粒细胞减少症的持续时间,通常使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)。我们回顾性地评估了在用Melphalan 200(Mel200)和APBSCT进行调理后,pegfilgrastim和filgrastim相比非格司亭对多发性骨髓瘤患者中性粒细胞植入,住院和支持措施的影响。 2006年1月至2009年12月,在我们机构对72例患者进行了Mel200治疗后的92次APBSCT。患者在APBSCT后接受单剂量培非非司亭(n = 46; 50%)或每日非格司亭(n = 46; 50%)(非格拉司亭使用中位时间9天;范围3-14天)。与非格司亭相比,pegfilgrastim IV级中性粒细胞减少症的持续时间较短(中位5天(范围3-14天)对6天(范围3-9天),p = 0.0079)。住院时间显着不同(培格非司亭(中位数14.5天;范围11-47天)与非格司亭(中位数15.5天;范围12-64天),p = 0.024)。接受Pegfilgrastim治疗的患者的红细胞输血较少(中位数为0,输血(范围为0-10),而0.5输血(范围为0-9),p = 0.00065)。与非格司亭相比,培格非司亭与治疗过程的成本降低相关(p = 0.031)。对于用Mel200和APBSCT治疗的骨髓瘤患者,培格非司亭似乎至少与非格司亭等效,而无需额外支出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号