首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >Efficacy of loratadine-montelukast on nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in an environmental exposure unit.
【24h】

Efficacy of loratadine-montelukast on nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis in an environmental exposure unit.

机译:氯雷他定-孟鲁司特对环境暴露单位季节性过敏性鼻炎患者鼻充血的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Nasal congestion is considered to be one of the most bothersome symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR) and often the most difficult to treat. Oral therapies providing safe, effective, and reliable relief of AR symptoms, including nasal congestion, are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of loratadine-montelukast (10 mg/10 mg) vs placebo and phenylephrine (10 mg) in relieving nasal congestion over 6 hours after ragweed pollen exposure in the environmental exposure unit at the Kingston General Hospital. METHODS: After a screening visit and up to 6 priming visits, patients who met minimum symptom requirements during ragweed pollen exposure were randomized to receive loratadine-montelukast, phenylephrine, or placebo. Patients evaluated nasal congestion and other symptoms of AR and measured peak nasal inspiratory flow before dosing and at 20-minute intervals during the subsequent 8 hours of pollen exposure. RESULTS: During the first 6 hours after treatment (primary end point), loratadine-montelukast treatment resulted in greater improvement in the mean nasal congestion score vs placebo (P = .007) and phenylephrine (P < .001). Loratadine-montelukast was more effective than placebo (P < or = .02) and phenylephrine (P < or = .002) in relieving total symptoms, nasal symptoms, and nonnasal symptoms and in improving peak nasal inspiratory flow. There were no statistically significant differences between phenylephrine and placebo for any measures. Fewer patients in the loratadine-montelukast group (3.9%) reported adverse events than in the phenylephrine (7.9%) and placebo (7.1%) groups; most adverse events were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Loratadine-montelukast was more effective than placebo and phenylephrine in relieving nasal congestion and other nasal and nonnasal symptoms resulting from ragweed pollen exposure. There was no statistically significant difference between phenylephrine and placebo.
机译:背景:鼻充血被认为是过敏性鼻炎(AR)的最令人讨厌的症状之一,并且通常是最难治疗的。可以安全,有效和可靠地缓解AR症状(包括鼻塞)的口服疗法是有限的。目的:评估在金斯敦总医院环境暴露单元中豚草花粉暴露后6小时内,单剂量氯雷他定-孟鲁司特(10 mg / 10 mg)与安慰剂和苯肾上腺素(10 mg)对缓解鼻塞的疗效。方法:在一次筛选访问和最多6次初诊访问之后,将豚草花粉暴露期间达到最低症状要求的患者随机分配接受氯雷他定-孟鲁司特,去氧肾上腺素或安慰剂。患者在给药前和随后的8小时花粉接触中,以20分钟为间隔,评估了鼻充血和AR的其他症状,并测量了鼻吸气峰值流量。结果:在治疗后的前6个小时(主要终点),氯雷他定-孟鲁司特治疗的平均鼻充血评分较安慰剂(P = .007)和去氧肾上腺素(P <.001)有更大的改善。氯雷他定-孟鲁司特在缓解总症状,鼻腔症状和非鼻腔症状以及改善鼻吸气峰值方面比安慰剂(P <或= .02)和去氧肾上腺素(P <或= .002)更有效。苯肾上腺素和安慰剂之间在任何方面均无统计学上的显着差异。氯雷他定-孟鲁司特组中报告不良事件的患者(3.9%)比苯肾上腺素(7.9%)和安慰剂组(7.1%)少;大多数不良事件为轻度或中度。结论:氯雷他定-孟鲁司特在缓解豚草花粉接触引起的鼻充血以及其他鼻和非鼻症状方面比安慰剂和去氧肾上腺素更有效。苯肾上腺素与安慰剂之间没有统计学上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号