...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >Relationship between recent short-acting β-agonist use and subsequent asthma exacerbations
【24h】

Relationship between recent short-acting β-agonist use and subsequent asthma exacerbations

机译:最近使用短效β受体激动剂与随后哮喘加重之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: US national guidelines recommend assessing short-acting β-agonist (SABA) medication use as a marker of asthma severity and control. However, the relationship between recent SABA use and asthma exacerbations is not currently known. Objective: To evaluate the proximal relationship between the type and frequency of SABA use and asthma-related outcomes. Methods: We evaluated SABA use among patients with asthma ages 5 to 56 years who were members of a large health maintenance organization in southeast Michigan. Frequency of use was estimated from pharmacy data assessing the timing and amount of SABA fills. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the prospective relationship between average daily SABA use for 3 months and outcomes associated with poor asthma control (ie, oral corticosteroids use, asthma-related emergency department visits, and asthma-related hospitalizations). We separately accounted for SABA metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and SABA nebulizer use. Results: Of the 2,056 patients who met study criteria, 1,569 (76.3%) had used a SABA medication in their baseline year. After adjusting for potential confounders, SABA nebulizer use was associated with asthma-related emergency department visits (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 6.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.38 to 16.80) and asthma-related hospitalizations (aHR, 21.62; 95% CI, 3.17 to 147.57). In contrast, frequency of SABA MDI use was not associated with these outcomes. Conclusions: Frequency of SABA use during a 3-month period was associated with poor asthma outcomes. The relationship with poor asthma outcomes was strongest for SABA nebulizer use, suggesting that the type of SABA used is also of prognostic importance.
机译:背景:美国国家指南建议评估短效β受体激动剂(SABA)药物作为哮喘严重程度和控制指标的用途。但是,目前尚不知道最近使用SABA与哮喘加重之间的关系。目的:评估SABA使用的类型和频率与哮喘相关结局之间的近端关系。方法:我们评估了隶属于密歇根州东南部大型健康维护组织的5至56岁哮喘患者的SABA使用情况。使用频率是根据药房数据估算的,评估了SABA填充的时间和数量。使用Cox比例风险模型检查了3个月的平均每日SABA使用量与哮喘控制不佳相关的结果(即口服皮质类固醇的使用,哮喘相关的急诊就诊以及哮喘相关的住院治疗)之间的前瞻性关系。我们分别说明了SABA定量吸入器(MDI)和SABA雾化器的使用情况。结果:符合研究标准的2056名患者中,有1569名(76.3%)在基准年使用过SABA药物。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,使用SABA雾化器与哮喘相关的急诊就诊(调整后的危险比[aHR]为6.32; 95%置信区间[CI]为2.38至16.80)和哮喘相关的住院治疗(aHR为21.62; 95%CI,3.17至147.57)。相反,使用SABA MDI的频率与这些结果无关。结论:3个月内使用SABA的频率与较差的哮喘预后相关。使用SABA雾化器与哮喘不良结局的关系最强,这表明使用的SABA类型也对预后具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号