...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >Patient-reported outcomes in adults with moderate to severe asthma after use of budesonide and formoterol administered via 1 pressurized metered-dose inhaler
【24h】

Patient-reported outcomes in adults with moderate to severe asthma after use of budesonide and formoterol administered via 1 pressurized metered-dose inhaler

机译:使用布地奈德和福莫特罗通过1台加压定量吸入器给药后,患者报告的中度至重度哮喘成人结局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are important for evaluating asthma therapy. Objective: To evaluate PROs in adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma receiving budesonide and formoterol administered via 1 pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Methods: This 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter study randomized 596 patients 12 years or older to budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 μg x 2 inhalations (320/9 μg); budesonide pMDI 160 μg x 2 inhalations (320 μg) + formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) 4.5 μg x 2 inhalations (9 μg); budesonide pMDI 160 μg x 2 inhalations (320 μg); formoterol DPI 4.5 μg x 2 inhalations (9 μg); or placebo, each twice daily, after 2 weeks of budesonide pMDI 80 μg x 2 inhalations (160 μg) twice daily. PROs were assessed in 553 patients 18 years or older using the standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]), Medical Outcomes Survey (MOS) Sleep Scale, Patient Satisfaction With Asthma Medication (PSAM) questionnaire, diary data, and global assessments. Results: Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol reported significantly greater improvements from baseline on the AQLQ(S) and asthma control variables (based on symptoms and rescue medication use; all P < .001) vs placebo. Clinically important improvements (increase of ≥0.5 points) from baseline to end of treatment in AQLQ(S) overall scores were achieved by 43.6% of patients receiving budesonide/formoterol vs 22.6% of patients receiving placebo (P = .001). The MOS Sleep Scale scores generally showed no differences among treatment groups. Patients receiving budesonide/formoterol had significantly greater PSAM questionnaire scores and better outcomes on physician-patient global assessments at end of treatment vs placebo (all P ≤ .001). Conclusion: Significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life and asthma control and greater treatment satisfaction were observed with budesonide/formoterol pMDI vs placebo.
机译:背景:患者报告的结局(PRO)对于评估哮喘治疗非常重要。目的:评估通过1次加压计量吸入器(pMDI)接受布地奈德和福莫特罗治疗的中重度持续性哮喘成人的PROs。方法:这项为期12周,双盲,双虚拟,安慰剂对照的多中心研究将596例12岁或12岁以上的患者随机接受布地奈德/福莫特罗pMDI 160 / 4.5μgx 2吸入(320/9μg);布地奈德pMDI 160μgx 2吸入(320μg)+福莫特罗干粉吸入器(DPI)4.5μgx 2吸入(9μg);布地奈德pMDI 160μgx 2吸入(320μg);福莫特罗DPI 4.5μgx 2吸入(9μg);布地奈德pMDI 2周80毫克x 2次吸入(160毫克)每天两次后,每天两次或安慰剂。使用标准的哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ [S]),医疗结果调查(MOS)睡眠量表,患者对哮喘药物的满意度(PSAM)问卷,日记数据和总体评估,对553名18岁以上的患者进行了PRO评估。结果:接受布地奈德/福莫特罗治疗的患者与安慰剂相比,AQLQ(S)和哮喘控制变量(基于症状和急救药物的使用;所有P <0.001)的基线改善显着更大。从基线到治疗结束,AQLQ(S)的总体得分在临床上有重要的临床改善(≥≥0.5分),接受布地奈德/福莫特罗的患者为43.6%,而接受安慰剂的患者为22.6%(P = .001)。 MOS睡眠量表评分通常显示治疗组之间无差异。与安慰剂相比,接受布地奈德/福莫特罗治疗的患者在治疗结束时的医患整体评估中PSAM问卷得分明显更高,且结局更好(所有P≤.001)。结论:与安慰剂相比,布地奈德/福莫特罗pMDI显着改善了健康相关的生活质量和哮喘控制,并提高了治疗满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号