...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry >How can immunochemical methods contribute to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive?
【24h】

How can immunochemical methods contribute to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive?

机译:免疫化学方法如何有助于水框架指令的实施?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Immunochemical methods (in particular immunoassays) have been applied to spring and surface water samples, respectively, which were set-up as reference materials (RM) within two proficiency testing campaigns. For the first set of proficiency tests (PTs) described here (which were actually the second round of PTs organized, spring 2005), three ELISAs (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) were employed in the enzyme tracer format for isoproturon, diuron, and atrazine, respectively. Results were evaluated in comparison with conventional reference methods (LC, GC). Based on their Z-score laboratory performances, the results for isoproturon and diuron were satisfactory, both for fortified spring water and for the blind solution. The results for atrazine were strongly influenced by other triazines present and needed detailed interpretation. For the second set of PTs described here (which were actually the third round of PTs organized, spring 2006), two ELISAs in the coating antigen format were used for isoproturon and diuron, and the result was included with the results obtained by conventional methods during the PTs. The results (the Z-scores) for isoproturon were again classified as satisfactory, in both fortified surface water and blind solution. The results for diuron in ELISA showed an influence of the water matrix, while the analysis of the blind solution was satisfactory. In addition, an ELISA in the enzyme tracer format was applied to analyze isoproturon, diuron, and atrazine in surface water samples, which had been set-up and spiked during a field trial (tank experiment) at the Maas River at Eijsden, The Netherlands. The immunoassay results were compared with those from an in-house on-line SPE LC/MS-MS used as reference. Although the immunochemical results were sometimes higher than those determined in the reference analysis, the general concentration trends in the samples were similar. The contribution of immunochemical methods to the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive is also discussed.
机译:免疫化学方法(特别是免疫测定法)已分别应用于泉水和地表水样品,在两个能力测试活动中将其设置为参考材料(RM)。对于此处描述的第一组能力验证(PT)(实际上是组织的第二轮PT,2005年春季),采用了三种酶联免疫吸附测定法(酶联免疫吸附测定),用于异proturon,diuron和atrazine , 分别。与常规参考方法(LC,GC)相比,对结果进行了评估。根据Z分数实验室的性能,对于强化泉水和盲溶液,异丙隆和敌草隆的结果均令人满意。阿特拉津的结果受到其他三嗪的强烈影响,需要详细解释。对于此处描述的第二组PT(实际上是组织的第三轮PT,2006年春季),使用了两种包被抗原形式的ELISA用于异丙肾上腺素和敌草隆,结果包括在常规方法中PT。在强化地表水和盲溶液中,异丙隆的结果(Z值)再次被评为令人满意。 ELISA中的diuron结果表明水基质的影响,而盲液的分析令人满意。此外,采用酶示踪剂形式的ELISA分析了地表水样品中的异丙隆,地隆和r去津,这些样品是在荷兰埃伊斯登的马斯河进行的田间试验(水箱实验)中建立并加标的。 。将免疫测定结果与内部在线SPE LC / MS-MS的结果进行比较。尽管有时免疫化学结果高于参考分析中确定的结果,但样品中的总体浓度趋势相似。还讨论了免疫化学方法对实施欧洲水框架指令的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号