...
首页> 外文期刊>Agronomy Journal >Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends
【24h】

Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends

机译:威斯康星州综合种植系统的有机和常规生产系统试验:III。产量趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST) at Arlington, WI, compared five production philosophies in place of fixed treatments, which can be problematic, during 1990 to 2012. Corn (Zea mays L.) was the test crop common to the five cropping systems. All five cropping systems produced positive, average corn yield trends ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 Mg ha(-1) yr(-1). The overall rates in three conventional systems exceeded those in two organic systems; but the systems nearly equalized when better technology was introduced in the organic systems. Genetic engineering did not accelerate yield improvements. Hence the difference between conventional and organic systems has been largely due to the available technology, not agroecological factors. The yield advantage for corn following alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) vs. continuous corn (the rotation effect) was 1.47 +/- 0.38 Mg ha(-1) with no linear or quadratic trends and with the largest values occurring in years with stresses that hindered corn development. Although all five cropping systems produced positive yield trends across two decades, that did not prove they were sustainable over the longer term. There was no clear advantage for either organic or conventional systems in regard to sustainability so the selection process should tailor the cropping system to the individual farm. The resulting picture is a dynamic agriculture with each cropping system encountering and solving challenges. Furthermore, it shows the benefits of long-term, cropping systems trials in providing base line data, monitoring time-trends, evaluating new technology, and examining sustainability issues
机译:在威斯康星州阿灵顿市进行的威斯康星州综合种植系统试验(WICST),比较了1990年至2012年期间采用五种生产方法代替固定处理方法的情况,这可能会出现问题。玉米是五种作物共同的试验作物系统。所有五个种植系统都产生了积极的,平均的玉米单产趋势,范围从0.1到0.2 Mg ha(-1)yr(-1)。三种常规系统的总收率超过了两种有机系统的总收率。但是当在有机系统中引入更好的技术时,系统几乎相等。基因工程并未加快产量的提高。因此,常规系统与有机系统之间的差异主要是由于可获得的技术,而不是农业生态因素。苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)相对于连续玉米(旋转效应)后的玉米产量优势为1.47 +/- 0.38 Mg ha(-1),无线性或二次趋势,并且在出现压力的年份出现最大值阻碍了玉米的发展。尽管在过去的20年中,所有五个种植系统都产生了积极的产量趋势,但这并不能证明它们在长期内可持续。有机或常规系统在可持续性方面均没有明显优势,因此选择过程应针对各个农场调整种植系统。由此产生的景象是充满活力的农业,每个种植系统都面临并解决挑战。此外,它还显示了长期种植系统试验在提供基准数据,监控时间趋势,评估新技术以及检查可持续性问题方面的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号