首页> 外文期刊>Agronomy for Sustainable Development >Evidence for farmers' active involvement in co-designing citrus cropping systems using an improved participatory method
【24h】

Evidence for farmers' active involvement in co-designing citrus cropping systems using an improved participatory method

机译:利用改进的参与方法,农民积极参与共同设计柑橘种植系统的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Agricultural policymakers are addressing the sustainable development issue by designing new agricultural systems. Farmers are ultimately asked to make deep changes at field scale. Designing cropping systems has previously been done using prototyping methodologies. Prototyping methodologies use a five-step designing process at field scale and request multicriteria analysis of the resulting prototypes. However, sustainable dynamics implies considering changes at larger scales, farm and region, as wellas creating feedback and facilitating participation of all the stakeholders involved in the process. Here we studied citrus production in Guadeloupe, French West Indies, where farmers must reduce pesticide loads despite unresolved weed control issues. Wedesigned the DISCS method, which stands for "participatory redesign and assess innovative cropping systems", to improve classical prototyping methods by implementing a multi-scale, multi-stakeholder, participatory approach. Compared to classical prototyping methods, the DISCS method differs by implementing three progress loops, at experimental field, farm, and regional scales. Three categories of professional stakeholders are involved: farmers, researchers, and agricultural advisers, who are collectively in charge of designing and testing cropping system prototypes. In addition, local public stakeholders including representatives of state institutions are consulted. Progress is assessed using scale-specific sets of indicators. The DISCS method was applied to develop low-pesticide citrus cropping systems. Five weed control prototypes were jointly designed by citrus farmers and researchers, and two multicriteria assessment tools were built for use at the experimental station and on the farms. Results show that involved farmers transferred the new techniques to their own farms on their own initiative, thus spontaneously becoming pilot farmers. The DISCS method is therefore the result of a co-design process between farmers and researchers. The DISCS method creates an ongoing dynamic relationship between agricultural and public stakeholders to build a solution that can continuously be adjusted to stakeholders' expectations.
机译:农业政策制定者正在通过设计新的农业系统来解决可持续发展问题。最终要求农民在田间规模上进行深刻的改变。以前使用原型方法完成了耕作系统的设计。原型设计方法在现场规模上使用五步设计过程,并要求对所得原型进行多标准分析。但是,可持续的动态意味着要考虑在更大的规模,农场和地区进行变化,以及创造反馈并促进参与该过程的所有利益相关者的参与。在这里,我们研究了法属西印度群岛瓜德罗普岛的柑桔生产,尽管杂草控制问题尚未解决,农民仍必须减少农药含量。我们设计了DISCS方法,该方法代表“参与式重新设计和评估创新的种植系统”,通过实施多尺度,多利益相关方的参与式方法来改进经典的原型方法。与经典的原型制作方法相比,DISCS方法的不同之处在于在实验场,农场和区域范围内实现了三个进度环。涉及三类专业利益相关者:农民,研究人员和农业顾问,他们共同负责设计和测试种植系统原型。此外,还咨询了包括国家机构代表在内的当地公共利益相关者。使用针对特定规模的指标集评估进度。 DISCS方法用于开发低农药柑橘种植系统。柑桔种植者和研究人员共同设计了五种杂草控制原型,并建立了两种多标准评估工具,供实验站和农场使用。结果表明,参与的农民主动将新技术转移到自己的农场,从而自发地成为试验农民。因此,DISCS方法是农民和研究人员之间共同设计过程的结果。 DISCS方法在农业和公共利益相关者之间建立了持续的动态关系,以构建可不断调整以适应利益相关者期望的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号