首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >A formative and self-reflective approach to monitoring and evaluation of interdisciplinary team research: An integrated water resource modelling application in Australia
【24h】

A formative and self-reflective approach to monitoring and evaluation of interdisciplinary team research: An integrated water resource modelling application in Australia

机译:跨学科团队研究的形成和自我反思方法:澳大利亚的综合水资源建模申请

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent literature on model evaluation has highlighted the need, particularly in an interdisciplinary problem and team setting, to go beyond the evaluation of results and outputs of a problem-solving pathway (process), and monitor and evaluate the pathway itself to improve ongoing activities undertaken by the research team that best achieve the desired impact. By reflecting on what decisions have been made, the reasons, influences and effects of each decision, such evaluation can improve the learning process of stakeholders and researchers. The authors have designed a formative, self-reflective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) process and applied it to an integrated assessment and modelling project in the Campaspe catchment, part of the Murray-Darling Basin in Victoria, Australia. The M&E process consists of six steps: 1) review of documents to understand research goals, priorities and records, 2) pathway assessment, 3) reflective meetings with each team member, 4) analysis of qualitative data from meetings to capture perceived strengths, weaknesses, successes and failures, and suggested actions, objections and goals, 5) survey to elicit feedback on identified goals, objectives and actions, and 6) a report of approved actions based on the conducted survey of team members. Four overall goals and constituent objectives were identified with 42 actions, and between 37 and 42 of these actions appear to have support for adoption. The evaluation indicated the benefits of the enhanced M&E approach to realise a more adaptive and effective problem-solving modelling and assessment project.
机译:关于模型评估的最新文献强调,尤其是在跨学科问题和团队环境中,需要超越对问题解决途径(过程)的结果和输出的评估,并对途径本身进行监控和评估,以改进研究团队进行的最能达到预期效果的持续活动。通过反思做出了哪些决策、每个决策的原因、影响和效果,这种评估可以改善利益相关者和研究人员的学习过程。作者设计了一个形成性、自我反思的监测和评估(M&E)过程,并将其应用于澳大利亚维多利亚州墨累-达令盆地坎帕斯流域的综合评估和建模项目。M&E过程包括六个步骤:1)审查文件以了解研究目标、优先事项和记录,2)路径评估,3)与每个团队成员的反思性会议,4)分析会议的定性数据以获取感知的优势、劣势、成功和失败,以及建议的行动、反对意见和目标,5)调查以获取对已确定目标的反馈,目标和行动,以及6)基于对团队成员进行的调查而批准的行动报告。通过42项行动确定了四个总体目标和组成目标,其中37至42项行动似乎支持采纳。评估表明,增强M&E方法有利于实现更具适应性和更有效的问题解决建模和评估项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号