首页> 外文期刊>Analytical Letters >Gold Nanoparticle Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry, Anodic Stripping Voltammetry, and Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry
【24h】

Gold Nanoparticle Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry, Anodic Stripping Voltammetry, and Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry

机译:电感耦合等离子体质谱法,阳极溶出伏安法和火焰原子吸收分光光度法测定金纳米颗粒

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Gold Nanoparticles (AuNP) were measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (SV), and flame Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Experiments investigated the relationships between counts per second (ICP-MS), absorbance (AAS), or μA (SV) and Au concentrations in solutions bearing AuNP with sizes of 5, 15, and 50 nm. Similarly the impact of the solution matrix was assessed using deionized water, 1.0 M HNO _3, 1.0 M HCl (ICP-MS and AAS), and water containing the bacterium E. coli (~10 ~6 organisms/mL) by all three types of instrumentation. Each instrument yielded linear calibration curves with a signal proportional to Au concentration over the concentration range 0.02 ppm to 1 ppm.The methods were all reliable when biomacromolecules or when organisms such as E.coli existed in the matrix. Comparing the limits of detection for the three methods, ICP-MS and SV were lower than AAS. Comparing cost, SV and AAS were less expensive than ICP-MS. Comparing time required for each measurement, AAS was shorter than ICP-MS and SV. In comparison of the interfering effects of E-coli, ICP-MS and AAS were less-affected, while SV was more affected. An intact E.coli or organism may be very absorptive on the electrode surface,which reduced the measured anodic currents in SV and also increased the standard deviations.
机译:金纳米颗粒(AuNP)通过电感耦合等离子体质谱(ICP-MS),阳极溶出伏安法(SV)和火焰原子吸收分光光度法(AAS)测量。实验研究了载有5、15和50 nm AuNP溶液中每秒计数(ICP-MS),吸光度(AAS)或μA(SV)与Au浓度之间的关系。类似地,使用三种类型的去离子水,1.0 M HNO _3、1.0 M HCl(ICP-MS和AAS)以及含有细菌细菌的水(〜10〜6个生物/ mL)评估溶液基质的影响。仪器。每种仪器都能产生线性校正曲线,并且在0.02 ppm至1 ppm的浓度范围内,信号均与Au浓度成比例。比较三种方法的检出限,ICP-MS和SV均低于AAS。比较成本,SV和AAS比ICP-MS便宜。比较每次测量所需的时间,AAS比ICP-MS和SV短。比较大肠杆菌的干扰效果,ICP-MS和AAS的影响较小,而SV的影响较大。完整的大肠杆菌或生物体在电极表面的吸收可能非常强,这降低了SV中测得的阳极电流,并增加了标准偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号