首页> 外文期刊>Analytical chemistry >Multiple choices for SNPs
【24h】

Multiple choices for SNPs

机译:SNP的多种选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Researchers face a myriad of SNP genotyping choices. Even before the completion of the human genome draft sequence, analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, pronounced "snips") was heralded as the next wave for the genomics field. Knowing all the locations of single-base variations, which occur roughly once every 1000 nucleotides throughout the genome, was supposed to hold the key to curing diseases and tailoring drug therapies for individuals. Since 1999, two large consortia of private and public research entities have deposited >1.8 million SNPs into a free database. Loads of data have been generated, but where's the payoff? "It's not yet been proven that SNPs can be used in all the ways people forecasted that they would," says Jim Lazar of Marligen Biosciences. Although Lazar says that research linking particular SNPs to particular medical conditions is lagging, he adds that it's only a matter of time before reality catches up to the hype. Researchers have already found that a handful of diseases, such as sickle cell anemia, stem from a single-base change, though they caution that most disease etiologies may not be that straightforward. As Hemanth Shenoi of Promega points out, "Life is too complicated to think that everything is a single SNP." Instead, combinations of SNPs may be important. To determine which SNPs are clinically relevant, researchers compare SNPs present in sick and healthy subjects. Sequencing is the gold standard for discovering new SNPs. However, if a researcher wants to find out which known SNPs are different between two individuals, sequencing is not typically the method of choice, according to John Butler of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. For most genotyping applications, the huge amount of data generated by sequencing is not needed to determine a one-base change. Scientists interested in SNP genotyping typically turn to methods that allow them to easily differentiate alleles, or SNP variants, without sorting through an alphabet soup of data. And there's a dizzying number of products on the market to help scientists with the task. Table 1, which is meant to be representative rather than comprehensive, lists several SNP genotyping assays and instruments. Experts say the market is crowded, and it's either growing or cooling off, depending on whom you ask. One company selling its technology to another is common, as is company turnover.
机译:研究人员面临着众多的SNP基因分型选择。甚至在人类基因组草图序列完成之前,对单核苷酸多态性(SNP,发音为“片段”)的分析就被认为是基因组学领域的下一波热潮。知道整个基因组中大约每1000个核苷酸发生一次的单碱基变异的所有位置,应该认为这是治愈疾病和为个体定制药物疗法的关键。自1999年以来,由私人和公共研究实体组成的两个大型财团将超过180万个SNP存放到一个免费数据库中。数据量已经生成,但是收益在哪里? Marligen Biosciences的吉姆·拉扎尔(Jim Lazar)说:“尚未证明SNP可以用于人们预料的所有方式。”尽管拉扎尔说,将特定SNP与特定医学状况联系起来的研究滞后,但他补充说,现实赶上炒作只是时间问题。研究人员已经发现,少数疾病,例如镰状细胞性贫血,源于单一基础的变化,尽管他们警告说,大多数疾病的病因可能并不那么简单。正如Promega的Hemanth Shenoi所指出的那样,“生活太复杂了,以至于无法将一切都视为一个SNP。”相反,SNP的组合可能很重要。为了确定哪些SNP与临床相关,研究人员比较了患病和健康受试者中存在的SNP。测序是发现新SNP的金标准。但是,根据美国国家标准技术研究院的约翰·巴特勒的说法,如果研究人员想找出两个个体之间哪些已知的SNP不同,则通常不是选择测序的方法。对于大多数基因分型应用,不需要通过测序产生的大量数据来确定一个碱基的变化。对SNP基因分型感兴趣的科学家通常会采用一些方法,使他们能够轻松区分等位基因或SNP变体,而无需对数据的字母分类进行分类。市场上有令人眼花number乱的产品可以帮助科学家完成这项任务。表1是代表性的而非全面的,列出了几种SNP基因分型测定法和仪器。专家说,市场很拥挤,它要么在增长,要么在降温,这取决于您问谁。一家公司向另一家公司出售技术是很常见的,公司营业额也是如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号