...
首页> 外文期刊>BioSystems >Is it possible that cells have had more than one origin?
【24h】

Is it possible that cells have had more than one origin?

机译:细胞是否有可能有多个原点?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cells occupy a prominent place in the history of life in Earth. The central role of cellular organization can be understood by the fact that ?cellular life? is often used as a synonym for life itself. Thus, most characteristics used to define cell overlap with those ones used to define life. However, innovative scenarios for the origin of life are bringing alternative views to describe how cells may have evolved from the open biological systems named progenotes. Here, using a logical and conceptual analysis, we re-evaluate the characteristics used to infer a single origin for cells. We argue that some evidences used to support cell monophyly, such as the presence of elements from the translation mechanism together with the universality of the genetic code, actually indicate a unique origin for all ?biological systems?, a term used to define not only cells, but also viruses and progenotes. Besides, we present evidence that at least two biochemical pathways as important as (i) DNA replication and (ii) lipid biosynthesis are not homologous between Bacteria and Archaea. The identities observed between the proteins involved in those pathways along representatives of these two ancestral domains of life are too low to indicate common genic ancestry. Altogether these facts can be seen as an indication that cellular organization has possibly evolved two or more times and that LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor) may not have existed as a cellular entity. Thus, we aim to consider the possibility that different strategies acquired by biological systems to exist, such as viral, bacterial and archaeal were most likely originated independently from the evolution of different progenote populations.
机译:细胞在地球生命历史中占据着一个突出的地方。蜂窝织组织的核心作用可以通过?细胞生命?通常用作生命本身的同义词。因此,用于定义单元格重叠的大多数特征与用于定义寿命的那些。然而,生命起源的创新情景正在带来替代视图,以描述如何从名为Progenotes的开放生物系统演变的替代意见。这里,使用逻辑和概念分析,我们重新评估用于推断单个单元的特性。我们争辩说,用于支持细胞的一些证据,例如从翻译机制的存在与遗传密码的普遍性,实际上是所有?生物系统的独特起源?,用于定义不仅限定细胞的术语,还有病毒和祖先。此外,我们提出了至少两种生物化学途径,与(i)DNA复制和(ii)脂质生物合成在细菌和古代之间不是同源的。在沿着这两个祖先域的代表涉及这些途径的蛋白质之间观察到的身份太低,无法表明常见的基因血统。完全可以看到这些事实可以被视为一种指示,即蜂窝组织可能演化了两个或更多次,并且卢卡(最后一个普遍的公共祖先)可能不存在作为蜂窝实体。因此,我们的目标是考虑通过生物系统获得的不同策略,例如病毒,细菌和古物,最有可能独立于不同的祖先种群的演变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号