首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >CD34(+) Cell Selection versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning and Unmodified Grafts for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients Age 50 Years with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome
【24h】

CD34(+) Cell Selection versus Reduced-Intensity Conditioning and Unmodified Grafts for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients Age 50 Years with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

机译:CD34(+)细胞选择对患者时代的同种异体造血细胞移植的降低强度调节和未改性移植物。 50年急性骨髓性白血病和骨髓增生术综合征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) and T cell depletion (TCD) through CD34 cell selection without the use of post-transplantation immunosuppression are 2 strategies used to reduce nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in older patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). To compare the efficacy of the RIC and TCD approaches, we evaluated the outcomes of patients age 50 years with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who underwent allo-HCT from an HLA-matched donor with one of these strategies. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the patients receiving TCD (n = 204). and those receiving RIC (n = 151), except for a higher proportion of unrelated donors (68% versus 40%; P .001) and a higher comorbidity burden (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index [HCT-C11 ?..3: 51% versus 38%; P .001) in the TCD cohort. Analysis of outcomes at 3 years showed a higher chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)/relapse-free survival (CRFS) (51% versus 7%; P .001), lower incidences of grade II-IV acute GVHD (18% versus 46% at day +180) and chronic GVHD (6% versus 55% at 3 years; P .001), and a lower incidence of relapse (19% versus 33% at 3 years; P=.001) in the TCD group compared with the RIC group. Relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and NRM were similar in the 2 groups. Combining transplantation approach (RIC versus TCD) and comorbidity burden (HCT-CI 0-2 versus patients with an HCT-CI score of 0-2 seemed to benefit from the TCD approach. In conclusion, in this retrospective study, the use of a CD34. cell-selected graft and a myeloablative conditioning regimen was associated with higher CRFS and similar RFS and OS compared with unmodified allo-RIC in patients age 50 years with AML and MDS. (C) 2017 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
机译:通过CD34细胞选择的减少强度调理(RIC)和T细胞耗尽(TCD),不使用移植后免疫抑制是2次用于在同种异体造血细胞移植(Allo-Hct)之后的老年患者中的非筛选死亡率(NRM)的策略。为了比较RIC和TCD方法的疗效,我们评估了患者年龄和GT的结果。50年与急性髓性白血病(AML)和骨髓增生术综合征(MDS)从HLA匹配的捐赠者接受了allo-hct与其中一个策略。在接受TCD的患者中基线特性相当(n = 204)。接受Ric(n = 151)的那些除了更高的无关供体比例(68%与40%; P& .001)和更高的合并负荷(造血细胞移植合并症指数[HCT-C11] :在TCD队列中,51%与38%; p& .001)。 3年的结果分析表明慢性接枝与宿主疾病(GVHD)/复发存活(CRF)(51%对7%; P& .001),较低的II-IV级急性GVHD发病率(在第+180天为46%的18%)和慢性GVHD(6%与55%为55%; P& .001),复发的发病率较低(3年,3年的33%; P =。 001)与TCD组相比,与RIC组相比。无复发存活(RFS),总体存活(OS)和NRM在2组中相似。结合移植方法(RIC与TCD)和合并症负担(HCT-CI 0-2与HCT-CI得分为0-2的患者似乎受益于TCD方法。总之,在这个回顾性研究中,使用a CD34。与患者年龄增长的未修改的Allo-RIC相比,细胞选择的移植物和霉菌调理方案与较高的CRF和类似的RFS和OS相关联。(C)2017年美国血液和骨髓移植社会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号