...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytical chemistry >Pressurized hot water extraction with on-line fluorescence monitoring: a comparison of the static, dynamic, and static-dynamic modes for the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from environmental solid samples
【24h】

Pressurized hot water extraction with on-line fluorescence monitoring: a comparison of the static, dynamic, and static-dynamic modes for the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from environmental solid samples

机译:带有在线荧光监测的加压热水萃取:静态,动态和静态-动态模式的比较,用于从环境固体样品中去除多环芳烃

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comparison of the feasibility of the three operational modes of pressurized hot solvent extraction (PHSE) (namely, static, where a fixed extractant volume is used; dynamic, where the extractant continually flows through the sample; and static-dynamic mode, which consists of a combination of the two previous modes) for the extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from environmental solid samples (such as soil, sediment, trout, and sardine) has been performed. In all cases, a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) aqueous solution was used as leaching agent. The use of a flow injection manifold between the extractor and a molecular fluorescence detector allowed real-time on-line fluorescence monitoring of the PAHs extracted from the samples, thus working as a screening system and providing qualitative and semi-quantitative information on the target analytes extracted from both natural and spiked samples. The on-line monitoring option allowed the extraction kinetics to be monitored and the end of the leaching step to be determined independently of the sample matrix, thereby reducing extraction times. Efficiencies close to 100% have been provided by the three modes, which differ in the extraction time required for total removal of the target compounds. The time needed for the dynamic mode was shorter than that for the static mode. However, the establishment of a static extraction step prior to dynamic extraction was the key to shorten the time required for complete extraction. The method has been applied to a certified reference material (CRM 524, BCR, industrial soil/organics) for quality assurance/validation. [References: 12]
机译:比较了加压热溶剂萃取(PHSE)的三种操作模式的可行性(即,静态,使用固定的萃取剂体积;动态,萃取剂连续流过样品;静态-动态模式,包括前两种模式的组合)已用于从环境固体样品(例如土壤,沉积物,鳟鱼和沙丁鱼)中提取多环芳烃(PAH)。在所有情况下,都使用十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)水溶液作为浸出剂。在萃取器和分子荧光检测器之间使用流动注射歧管可以实时实时在线监测从样品中提取的多环芳烃,从而可以作为筛选系统并提供有关目标分析物的定性和半定量信息从天然和加标样品中提取。在线监测选项允许独立于样品基质监测萃取动力学并确定浸出步骤的结束,从而减少了萃取时间。三种模式提供的效率接近100%,这在完全去除目标化合物所需的萃取时间方面有所不同。动态模式所需的时间比静态模式所需的时间短。但是,在动态提取之前建立静态提取步骤是缩短完整提取所需时间的关键。该方法已应用于经过认证的参考材料(CRM 524,BCR,工业土壤/有机物)以进行质量保证/验证。 [参考:12]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号