首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Comprehensive review of current natural gas liquefaction processes on technical and economic performance
【24h】

Comprehensive review of current natural gas liquefaction processes on technical and economic performance

机译:综述当前天然气液化过程技术和经济绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides a quantitative technical and economic overview of the status of natural-gas liquefaction (LNG) processes. Data is based on industrial practices in technical reports and optimization results in academic literature, which are harmonized to primary energy input and production cost. The LNG processes reviewed are classified into three categories: onshore large-scale, onshore small-scale and offshore. These categories each have a different optimization focus in academic literature. Besides minimizing energy consumption, the focus is also on: coproduction for large-scale; simplicity and ease of operation for small-scale; and low space requirement, safety and insensitivity to motion for offshore. The review on academic literature also indicated that optimization for lowest energy consumption may not lead to the lowest production cost. The review on technical reports shows that the mixed-refrigerant process dominates the LNG industry, but has competitions from the cascade process in large-scale applications and from the expander-based process in small-scale and offshore applications. This study also found that there is a potential improvement in adopting new optimization algorithms for efficiently solving complex optimization problems. The technical performance overview shows that the primary energy input for large-scale processes (0.031-0.102 GJ/GJ LNG) is lower than for small-scale processes (0.049-0.362 GJ/GJ LNG). However, the primary energy input for identical processes do not necessarily decrease with increasing capacity and the performance of major equipment shows low correlation with scale. The economic performance overview shows specific capital costs varying significantly from 124 to 2255 $/TPA LNG. The variation could be, among others, caused by the different complexities of the facility and different local circumstances. Production cost, excluding feed costs, varies between 0.69 and 4.10 $/GJ LNG, with capital costs being the dominant contributor. The feed cost itself could be 1.51-4.01 $/GJ LNG, depending on the location. Lastly, the quantitative harmonization results on technical and economic performance in this study can function as a baseline for the purpose of comparison.
机译:本文提供了天然气液化(LNG)过程的定量技术和经济概述。数据基于技术报告中的工业实践,以及学术文献的优化结果,与初级能源投入和生产成本统一。审查的LNG流程被分为三类:陆上大规模,陆上小规模和海上。这些类别每个类别都在学术文献中具有不同的优化焦点。除了最大限度地降低能耗外,还为目的,重点是:大规模的共同规模;小规模的简单性和易于操作;和近岸运动的低空间要求,安全性和不敏感。学术文献审查还表明,最低能耗优化可能不会导致最低生产成本。关于技术报告的审查表明,混合制冷剂流程占据了液化天然气工业,而是从大规模应用中的级联过程和基于小型和海上应用中的扩展过程中的级联过程的竞争。本研究还发现,采用新的优化算法,潜在改进,以便有效地解决复杂优化问题。技术性能概述表明,大型过程的主要能量输入(0.031-0.102 GJ / GJ LNG)低于小规模过程(0.049-0.362 GJ / GJ LNG)。然而,相同过程的主要能量输入不一定随着容量的增加而降低,主要设备的性能显示出与比例的低相关性。经济绩效概述表明,特定的资本成本从124到2255美元/ TPA LNG显着变化。这些变化可以是由设施的不同复杂性和不同的本地情况。生产成本,不包括饲料成本,在0.69和4.10美元之间变化,资本成本是主要的贡献者。饲料成本本身可以是1.51-4.01 $ / gj lng,具体取决于位置。最后,对本研究中的技术和经济性能的定量协调可以作为基准作为比较的基线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号