...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Design of structure and optimization of organic Rankine cycle for heat recovery from gas turbine: The use of 4E, advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analysis
【24h】

Design of structure and optimization of organic Rankine cycle for heat recovery from gas turbine: The use of 4E, advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analysis

机译:燃气轮机热回收有机朗克循环结构和优化设计:使用4E,先进的漏洞和先进的Exergo经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents the evaluation and optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) approached from four different perspectives: (1) selecting the ORC Cycle; (2) selecting the working fluid in accordance with the thermodynamic properties and environmental impacts; (3) analyzing energy and exergoeconomic; and finally, (4) advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic. The working fluid is selected based on the thermal source temperature and the environmental impacts including the reduction of ozone depletion (ODP) and global warming potential (GWP). Then, the selected working fluids in different cycles are investigated in terms of the thermodynamic properties based on energy and exergy concepts. The parameters of the selected cycles (from the perspective of energy and exergy), including the temperature and pressure of the input working fluid of the turbine, the pinch and approach temperature, and so on, are optimized by a genetic algorithm. Two objective functions of price and exergy efficiency are selected as the objective functions for optimal cycles. The results of this study reveal that single-pressure and dual-pressure cycles with recuperator and the R123 working fluid have the highest power and the lowest cost. It is indicated that the net power generation of dual pressure cycle with recuperator, single pressure with recuperator, and dual pressure cycle with two working fluids are 2.2 kW, (R123: 2.31 kW, R600: 1.72 kW) and 2.26 kW, respectively. Also, the cost of generated electricity for dual pressure cycle with recuperator, single pressure cycle with recuperator, and dual pressure cycle with two working fluids are 14.59, (R123: 13.03, R600: 21.95) and 16.78 (Cent/kWh), respectively. In addition, the results show that the cycles of dual pressure with recuperator and single pressure with recuperator with R123 as a working fluid have the highest exergy efficiency. The advanced exergy analysis indicated that the HRSG and turbine components are important to be improved based on exergetic performance.
机译:本文提出了从四种不同观点接近的有机朗肯循环(ORC)的评估和优化:(1)选择兽人循环; (2)根据热力学性质和环境影响选择工作流体; (3)分析能源和exergo经济;最后,(4)先进的Deergy和先进的Exergo经济学。基于热源温度和环境影响选择工作流体,包括减少臭氧耗尽(ODP)和全球变暖潜力(GWP)。然后,根据能量和暴露概念的热力学性质来研究不同循环中所选择的工作流体。通过遗传算法优化所选循环的所选循环的参数(从能量和漏极的透视),包括涡轮机的输入工作流体的温度和压力等。选择价格和高级效率的两个客观函数作为最佳循环的客观函数。该研究的结果表明,具有恢复器的单压和双压循环和R123工作流体具有最高功率和最低成本。结果表明,具有恢复器的双压周期的净发电,具有恢复器的单个压力和两个工作流体的双压循环分别为2.2 kW,(R123:2.31 kW,R600:1.72 kW)和2.26kW。而且,具有恢复器的双压循环的产生电力的成本,分别具有两个工作流体的单一压力循环,具有两个工作流体的双压循环为14.59,(R123:13.03,R600:21.95)和16.78(分/千瓦时)。此外,结果表明,作为工作流体的恢复器的双重压力和单个压力与R123的循环具有最高的效率。先进的Deergy分析表明,基于前进性能,HRSG和涡轮机组件很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号