首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >Exergetic and exergoeconomic studies of two highly efficient power-cooling cogeneration systems based on the Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles
【24h】

Exergetic and exergoeconomic studies of two highly efficient power-cooling cogeneration systems based on the Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles

机译:基于Kalina和吸收制冷循环的两种高效电力冷却热系统的exergetic和Exergo经济研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent technological developments have made it possible to generate power and cooling using the Kalina cycle (KC) through low grade heat sources utilization. The Kalina cooling-power cycle (KPCC) and Kalina LiBr-H2O absorption chiller cycle (KLACC) are two novel cases that have been proposed and analyzed with regard to their energetic and economic aspects. These systems combine the KC with NH3-H2O and LiBr-H2O absorption chillers, respectively. Having obtained the energy analysis results, exergy analysis is performed to analyze and compare the systems. A comparative exergoeconomic assessment is performed to obtain the unit cost of power-cooling generation. The exergetic analysis demonstrated total exergy destruction of KLACC is 40% higher than KPCC where major exergy destruction occurs in both condenser and second flash tank preheater. The KLACC exergetic efficiency is almost same as the KC although it is higher for KPCC system by 6.8%. According to the exergoeconomic analysis, the unit cost of power-cooling generation for KPCC is 20.5% lower than KLACC; therefore, KPCC performance is better than KLACC. The significant exergy destruction locations to optimize the system performance are the absorber in KPCC and second condenser in KLACC. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的技术发展使得通过低级热源利用率使用Kalina循环(KC)可以产生电力和冷却。 Kalina冷却功率循环(KPCC)和Kalina Libr-H2O吸收冷却循环(KLACC)是两种新的病例,这些情况已经提出并分析了他们的能量和经济方面。这些系统分别将KC与NH3-H2O和LIBR-H2O吸收冷却器组合。获得了能量分析结果,进行了Deergy分析以分析和比较系统。进行比较的Exergo经济评估,以获得电力冷却产生的单位成本。前进分析表明,KLACC的总遭受破坏是40%高于KPCC,其中在冷凝器和第二闪蒸罐预热器中发生重大的漏洞破坏。 KLACC exerget效率几乎与KC相同,但KPCC系统较高6.8%。根据exergo经济分析,KPCC电力冷却发电的单位成本低于KLACC 20.5%;因此,KPCC性能优于KLACC。优化系统性能的重要漏洞破坏位置是KLACC中KPCC和第二电容器中的吸收器。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号