...
首页> 外文期刊>Analytica chimica acta >Assessing sample extraction efficiencies for the analysis of complex unresolved mixtures of organic pollutants: A comprehensive non-target approach
【24h】

Assessing sample extraction efficiencies for the analysis of complex unresolved mixtures of organic pollutants: A comprehensive non-target approach

机译:评估样品提取效率,分析复杂的有机污染物混合物:全面的非目标方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The comprehensive extraction recovery assessment of organic analytes from complex samples such as oil field produced water (PW) is a challenging task. A targeted approach is usually used for recovery and determination of compounds in these types of analysis. Here we suggest a more comprehensive and less biased approach for the extraction recovery assessment of complex samples. This method combines conventional targeted analysis with a non- targeted approach to evaluate the extraction recovery of complex mixtures. Three generic extraction methods: liquid-liquid extraction (Lq), and solid phase extraction using HLB cartridges (HLB), and the combination of ENV+ and C8 (ENV) cartridges, were selected for evaluation. PW was divided into three parts: non-spiked, spiked level 1, and spiked level 2 for analysis. The spiked samples were used for targeted evaluation of extraction recoveries of 65 added target analytes comprising alkanes, phenols, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, producing absolute recoveries. The non-spiked samples were used for the non-targeted approach, which used a combination of the F-ratio method and apex detection algorithm. Targeted analysis showed that the use of ENV cartridges and the Lq method performed better than use of HLB cartridges, producing absolute recoveries of 53.1 +/- 15.2 for ENV and 46.8 +/- 13.2 for Lq versus 19.7 +/- 6.7 for HLB. These two methods appeared to produce statistically similar results for recoveries of analytes, whereas they were both different from the produced recoveries via the HLB method. The non- targeted approach captured unique features that were specific to each extraction method. This approach generated 26 unique features (mass spectral ions), which were significantly different between samples and were relevant in differentiating each extract from each method. Using a combination of these targeted and non-targeted methods we evaluated the extraction recoveries of the three extraction methods for analysis of PW. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:来自复杂样品的有机分析物的综合提取恢复评估,例如油田产生的水(PW)是一个具有挑战性的任务。目标方法通常用于在这些类型的分析中的复制和测定化合物。在这里,我们为复合样品提取恢复评估提出了更全面和更少的偏见方法。该方法将常规靶向分析与非靶向方法结合起来评估复杂混合物的提取恢复。三种通用提取方法:使用HLB盒(HLB)的液 - 液萃取(LQ)和固相提取,以及Env +和C8(env)盒的组合进行评估。 PW分为三个部分:非尖刺,尖刺级别1,尖刺级2分析。掺入样品用于靶向评价65加入的靶分析物的提取回收,包含烷烃,酚和多环芳烃,产生绝对回收率。非掺入样品用于非靶向方法,其使用F比方法和顶点检测算法的组合。有针对性的分析表明,使用ENV盒和LQ方法的使用比使用HLB盒的使用,产生53.1 +/-15.2的绝对回收率,对于HLB而言,LQ为19.7 +/- 6.7的46.8 +/-13.2。这两种方法似乎产生了对分析物的回收率产生的统计上类似的结果,而它们既不同通过HLB法与所生产的回收率不同。非目标方法捕获了针对每个提取方法的独特功能。该方法产生了26个独特的特征(质谱离子),它们在样品之间显着差异,并且在从每种方法中区分每个提取物相关。使用这些靶向和非靶向方法的组合,我们评估了三种提取方法的提取回收率,用于分析PW。 (c)2018 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Analytica chimica acta》 |2018年第2018期|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA Gaustadalleen 21 N-0349 Oslo Norway;

    Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA Gaustadalleen 21 N-0349 Oslo Norway;

    Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA Gaustadalleen 21 N-0349 Oslo Norway;

    Thermo Fisher Sci Str Rivoltana I-20090 Milan Italy;

    Fac Sci &

    Engn Sch Geog Earth &

    Environm Sci Plymouth PL4 8AA Devon England;

    Thermo Fisher Sci Telefonvagen 30 S-12626 Hagersten Sweden;

    Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA Gaustadalleen 21 N-0349 Oslo Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 分析化学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号