首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Validation of the doubly labeled water method using off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy and isotope ratio mass spectrometry
【24h】

Validation of the doubly labeled water method using off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy and isotope ratio mass spectrometry

机译:使用脱轴集成腔输出光谱和同位素比质谱法验证双标记的水法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When the doubly labeled water (DLW) method is used to measure total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), isotope measurements are typically performed using isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS). New technologies, such as off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy (OA-ICOS) provide comparable isotopic measurements of standard waters and human urine samples, but the accuracy of carbon dioxide production (V_(co_2)) determined with OA-ICOS has not been demonstrated. We compared simultaneous measurement V_(co_2) obtained using whole-room indirect calorimetry (IC) with DLW-based measurements from IRMS and OA-ICOS. Seventeen subjects (10 female; 22 to 63 yr) were studied for 7 consecutive days in the IC. Subjects consumed a dose of 0.25 g H_2~(18)O (98% APE) and 0.14 g ~2H_2O (99.8% APE) per kilogram of total body water, and urine samples were obtained on days 1 and 8 to measure average daily V_(co_2) using OA-ICOS and IRMS. V_(co_2) was calculated using both the plateau and intercept methods. There were no differences in V_(co_2) measured by OA-ICOS or IRMS compared with IC when the plateau method was used. When the intercept method was used, V_(co_2) using OA-ICOS did not differ from IC, but V_(co_2) measured using IRMS was significantly lower than IC. Accuracy (~1-5%), precision (~8%), intraclass correlation coefficients (R = 0.87-90), and root mean squared error (30-40 liters/ day) of V_(co_2) measured by OA-ICOS and IRMS were similar. Both OA-ICOS and IRMS produced measurements of V_(co_2)with comparable accuracy and precision compared with IC.
机译:当使用双标记的水(DLW)方法来测量总日能耗(TDEE)时,通常使用同位素比质谱(IRMS)进行同位素测量。新技术,如轴外集成腔输出光谱(OA-ICOS)提供标准水和人类尿液样品的可比同位素测量,但用OA-ICOS确定的二氧化碳产生(V_(CO_2))的准确性未通过展示。我们将使用全室间接热量测量法(IC)的同时测量V_(CO_2)与来自IRMS和OA-ICOS的DLW测量获得。在IC中连续7天进行了十七个受试者(10名女性; 22至63岁)。受试者消耗的剂量为0.25g H_2〜(18)o(98%ape)和每千克总体水的0.14g〜2h_2O(99.8%),并且在第1天和8天获得尿液样品以测量平均每日V_ (CO_2)使用OA-ICOS和IRMS。使用高原和截距方法计算V_(CO_2)。通过OA-ICOS或IRMS测量的V_(CO_2)没有差异,当使用平台法时,与IC相比。使用截距方法时,使用OA-ICOS的V_(CO_2)没有与IC不同,但使用IRMS测量的V_(CO_2)显着低于IC。精度(〜1-5%),精度(〜8%),腹部相关系数(r = 0.87-90),由OA-ICOS测量的V_(CO_2)的根均方误差(30-40升/天)和IRMS相似。与IC相比,OA-ICOS和IRMS两者都以可比的精度和精确度产生了V_(CO_2)的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号