首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Comparison of canopy temperature-based water stress indices for maize
【24h】

Comparison of canopy temperature-based water stress indices for maize

机译:基于冠层温度的玉米水分胁迫指数比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Infrared thermal radiometers (IRTs) are an affordable tool for researchers to monitor canopy temperature. In this maize experiment, six treatments of regulated deficit irrigation levels were evaluated. The main objective was to evaluate these six treatments in terms of six indices (three previously proposed and three introduced in this study) used to quantify water stress. Three are point-in-time indices where one daily reading is assumed representative of the day (Crop Water Stress Index - CWSI, Degrees Above Non-Stressed DANS, Degrees Above Canopy Threshold - DACT) and three integrate the cumulative impact of water stress over time (Time Temperature Threshold - TTT, Integrated Degrees Above Non-Stressed - IDANS, Integrated Degrees Above Canopy Threshold - IDACT). Canopy temperature was highly correlated with leaf water potential (R-2=0.895). To avoid potential bias, the lowest observation from the non-stressed treatment was chosen as the baseline for DANS and IDANS indices. Early afternoon temperatures showed the most divergence and thus this is the ideal time to obtain spot index values. Canopy temperatures and stress indices were responsive to evapotranspiration-based irrigation treatments. DANS and DACT were highly correlated with CWSI above the corn threshold 28 degrees C used in the TIT method, and all indices showed linear relationship with soil water deficit at high temperatures. Recommendations are given to consider soils with high water-holding capacity when choosing a site for non-stressed reference crops used in the DANS method. The DACT may be the most convenient index, as all it requires is a single canopy temperature measurement yet has strong relationships with other indices and crop water measurements. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:红外热辐射计(IRT)是研究人员用来监测顶篷温度的负担得起的工具。在该玉米实验中,评估了六种调节灌溉亏水水平的处理方法。主要目的是根据用于量化水分胁迫的六个指数(先前提出的三个和本研究中引入的三个)评估这六种处理方法。三个是时间点指数,其中一个每日读数被认为是一天的代表(作物水分胁迫指数-CWSI,高于非胁迫DANS的程度,高于冠层阈值的程度-DACT),而三个则综合了水分胁迫对时间(时间温度阈值-TTT,高于非压力的积分度-IDANS,高于冠层阈值的积分度-IDACT)。冠层温度与叶片水势高度相关(R-2 = 0.895)。为了避免潜在的偏倚,选择来自无压力治疗的最低观察值作为DANS和IDANS指数的基线。下午早些时候的温度差异最大,因此这是获取现货指数值的理想时间。冠层温度和应力指数对基于蒸散的灌溉处理有响应。在TIT方法中,高于玉米阈值28°C时,DANS和DACT与CWSI高度相关,并且所有指标均与高温下的土壤水分亏缺呈线性关系。当选择DANS方法中使用的非受力参考作物的地点时,建议考虑具有高持水能力的土壤。 DACT可能是最方便的指标,因为它只需要一个树冠温度测量值,却与其他指标和作物水分测量值有很强的关系。由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号