首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >The effects of irrigation methods with effluent and irrigation scheduling on water use efficiency and corn yields in an arid region
【24h】

The effects of irrigation methods with effluent and irrigation scheduling on water use efficiency and corn yields in an arid region

机译:干旱区污水灌溉方式和灌溉时间表对水分利用效率和玉米产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A great challenge for the agricultural sector is to produce more food from less water, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions which suffer from water scarcity. A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of three irrigation methods, using effluent versus fresh water, on water savings, yields and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE). The irrigation scheduling was based on soil moisture and rooting depth monitoring. The experimental design was a split plot with three main treatments, namely subsurface drip (SSD), surface drip (SD) and furrow irrigation (FI) and two sub-treatments effluent and fresh water, which were applied with three replications. The experiment was conducted at the Marvdasht city (Southern Iran) wastewater treatment plant during 2005 and 2006. The experimental results indicated that the average water applied in the irrigation treatments with monitoring was much less than that using the conventional irrigation method (using furrows but based on a constant irrigation interval, without moisture monitoring). The maximum water saving was obtained using SSD with 5907mpd hap# water applied, and the minimum water saving was obtained using FI with 6822mpd hap#. The predicted irrigation water requirements using the Penman-Monteith equation (considering 85% irrigation efficiency for the FI method) was 10,743mpd hap#. The pressure irrigation systems (SSD and SD) led to a greater yield compared to the surface method (FI). The highest yield (12.11x10pd kghap#) was obtained with SSD and the lowest was obtained with the FI method (9.75x10pd kghap#). The irrigation methods indicated a highly significant difference in irrigation water use efficiency. The maximum IWUE was obtained with the SSD (2.12kgmpd) and the minimum was obtained with the FI method (1.43kgmpd). Irrigation with effluent led to a greater IWUE compared to fresh water, but the difference was not statistically significant.
机译:农业部门面临的巨大挑战是用更少的水生产更多的粮食,特别是在缺水的干旱和半干旱地区。进行了一项研究,以评估三种灌溉方法(使用废水还是淡水)对节水,产量和灌溉用水效率(IWUE)的影响。灌溉计划基于土壤水分和生根深度监测。实验设计是一个分块样地,具有三种主要处理方法,即地下滴灌(SSD),表面滴灌(SD)和犁沟灌溉(FI),以及两个子处理废水和淡水,并进行了三个重复试验。该实验于2005年至2006年在Marvdasht市(伊朗南部)废水处理厂进行。实验结果表明,在带监测的灌溉处理中所应用的平均水量比传统的灌溉方法要少得多(使用犁沟,但在恒定的灌溉间隔内,无需监控湿度)。使用具有5907mpd hap#水的SSD可以实现最大节水,而使用具有6822mpd hap#的FI可以实现最小的节水。使用Penman-Monteith方程预测的灌溉水需求(考虑到FI方法的灌溉效率为85%)为10,743mpd hap#。与地表方法(FI)相比,压力灌溉系统(SSD和SD)导致更高的产量。使用SSD可获得最高产量(12.11x10pd kghap#),而采用FI方法可获得最低产量(9.75x10pd kghap#)。灌溉方法表明,灌溉用水效率存在显着差异。使用SSD可获得最大IWUE(2.12kgmpd),使用FI方法可获得最小IWUE(1.43kgmpd)。与淡水相比,污水灌溉的IWUE更大,但差异无统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号