...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Water Management >Comparison of different methods to measure and model actual evapotranspiration rates for a wet sloping grassland
【24h】

Comparison of different methods to measure and model actual evapotranspiration rates for a wet sloping grassland

机译:比较测量和模拟湿坡草地实际蒸散速率的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate measurements of the turbulent exchanges of mass and energy at the land surface are necessary for a good understanding of the various components of the hydrological cycle. The two most commonly used methods to measure evapotranspiration rates are the Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) and the Eddy correlation (EC) methods. These methods are applicable when a number of requirements, mostly with respect to terrain topography and homogeneous fetch extension, are fulfilled. On the other hand, meteorological variables can be used to calculate evapotranspiration rates. The two most frequently used methods for this purpose are the Penman-Monteith (PM) combination equation and the Priestley-Taylor (PT) approximation. The objective of this paper is to compare these different methods under non-ideal conditions, more specifically for a wet sloping grassland. The BREB-based and EC-based latent heat fluxes are intercompared, and a good agreement between the estimates from both methods is found. A comparison between the results of the PM and PT methods and the measured latent heat fluxes is then done. A strong annual cycle in the calculated values for the PT alfa factor ( alpha ), with a mean annual average value of 1.21+/-0.79, has been observed. This annual cycle is related to the annual cycle of the humidity of the soil, which can be evaluated by either the soil moisture or the vapor deficit of the air. A strong annual cycle in the inverted surface resistances has also been observed. A relationship between the inverted surface resistances and alpha has been found, in which the highest values for alpha coincide with low surface resistances, and vice versa. The results indicate that the methods to measure and calculate latent heat fluxes are in a good agreement, and that imposing an annual cycle in the surface resistance and alpha leads to an improvement in the estimated evapotranspiration rates. The results suggest that it is possible to measure or model evapotranspiration rates in situations where the theoretical requirements (more specifically a non-sloping surface) are not met.
机译:为了更好地了解水文循环的各个组成部分,必须准确测量陆地表面质量和能量的湍流交换。两种最常用的测量蒸散速率的方法是鲍文比能量平衡(BREB)和涡流相关(EC)方法。这些方法适用于满足许多要求(主要是有关地形地形和同质提取扩展)的情况。另一方面,气象变量可用于计算蒸散速率。为此目的,两种最常用的方法是Penman-Monteith(PM)组合方程和Priestley-Taylor(PT)近似。本文的目的是比较非理想条件下的这些不同方法,尤其是针对湿坡草地。将基于BREB的潜热通量与基于EC的潜热通量进行了比较,发现两种方法的估计值之间具有良好的一致性。然后将PM和PT方法的结果与测得的潜热通量进行比较。在PT阿尔法因子(α)的计算值中,观察到了一个强大的年周期,年均平均值为1.21 +/- 0.79。该年度循环与土壤湿度的年度循环有关,可以通过土壤湿度或空气中的水分亏缺来评估。倒置表面电阻的年循环也很强。已经发现倒置的表面电阻与α之间的关系,其中α的最大值与低的表面电阻一致,反之亦然。结果表明,测量和计算潜热通量的方法具有很好的一致性,并且在表面电阻和α上施加年度循环会导致估计的蒸散速率得到改善。结果表明,在不满足理论要求(更具体地说是不倾斜表面)的情况下,可以测量或模拟蒸散速率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号