...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >Evaluating the efficiency of two automatic fertigation systems in soilless crops: substrate moisture sensors vs. timer systems
【24h】

Evaluating the efficiency of two automatic fertigation systems in soilless crops: substrate moisture sensors vs. timer systems

机译:评估无土庄稼两种自动灌溉系统的效率:基板湿度传感器与定时器系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fertigation systems are the main method of nutrition for vegetable production in greenhouses; they allow an efficient and homogeneous distribution of water and nutrients. In most cases when using substrates, it is necessary to apply dissolved nutrients in a large number of low-volume fertigations. Numerous fertigation systems exist based on nutrient input needed at each physiological stage of the crop, the volumetric moisture content of the soil substrate at a given time per the farmers' criteria, solar radiation, evapotranspiration, and the demand tray. In all cases, these variables must be controlled by evaluating the drainage volume, electrical conductivity, and pH of the drainage throughout the crop cycle. Here, a qualitative comparison was madebetween two fertigation systems: the time schedule system, as this is the most common system used in Mediterranean vegetable production, and the volumetric moisture method. For this purpose, a long-cycle tomato crop established in coconut fiber substrate was used. The evaluated variables were: aerial and radical biomass, crop nutritional status, yield, and quality and efficiency of water and fertilizers. Both systems used the same nutrient solution but differed with regard to the frequency and number of irrigations applied. The management of the fertigation system based on the time schedule was determined via climatic demand by checking the drainage percentage and EC of the drainage. However, the fertigation system based on moisture was conducted by using a dielectric probe installed in the substrate that conditioned the demand for fertigation to maintain volumetric moisture in a range between 20 and 28% throughout the production cycle. Results revealed significant differences between the two systemswith regard to the total amount of water used. The volumetric moisture system had a lower consumption of water and fertilizer than the timed system, representing lower production cost, higher productivity, and decreased loss of nutrients by leaching.
机译:灌溉系统是温室蔬菜生产营养的主要方法;它们允许水和营养的有效和均匀分布。在大多数情况下,使用基材时,必须在大量的低容量卷发中施加溶解的营养物。基于作物各种生理阶段所需的营养输入存在许多灌溉系统,土壤基质在每次农民标准,太阳辐射,蒸发料和需求托盘上的给定时间的体积水分含量。在所有情况下,必须通过在整个作物周期中评估排水量,导电性和引流的引流的pH值来控制这些变量。在这里,MATEDATIVE比较是两个灌溉系统:时间表系统,因为这是地中海植物生产中最常见的系统,以及体积水分方法。为此目的,使用在椰子纤维基板中建立的长循环番茄作物。评估的变量是:天线和自由基生物量,作物营养状况,产量和水和肥料的质量和效率。两种系统使用相同的营养溶液,但在施加的灌溉频率和次数方面不同。通过检查排水的排水百分比和EC来确定基于时间表的灌溉系统的管理。然而,通过使用安装在基材中的介电探针进行基于水分的灌溉系统,该探针调节灌溉的需求,以在整个生产周期中保持20%至28%的体积水分。结果表明,两种系统之间的差异存在显着差异,这是所用水总量的。体积水分系统的水和肥料少于定时系统,代表较低的生产成本,更高的生产率,通过浸出减少营养损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号