首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Questioning Succinylcholine Usage in Grade IV (Difficult) Mask Ventilation.
【24h】

Questioning Succinylcholine Usage in Grade IV (Difficult) Mask Ventilation.

机译:对琥珀酸胆碱在IV级(困难)面罩通气中的用法提出质疑。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We thankXue et al. and Shetty et al. for the interesting letters they sent in response to our recent article. We fully agree with the first remark by Xue et al. We did not provide the method of anesthesia induction used in our protocol. However, we thought our method was clear enough to prevent any doubt regarding the technique of induction. All the adult patients received intravenous boluses of appropriate dosage of opioids and hypnotic agents (in most cases sufentanil and propofol, respectively). In our country, inhalation-induction of anesthesia is not popular in adults. Moreover, all the patients received neuromuscular blocking agents. We deliberately standardized anesthesia procedure to prevent poor anesthesia quality affecting airway management quality. Facemask ventilation (FMV) was attempted only if anesthesia depth and apneic status were confirmed both clinically and instrumentally. We are confident that Xue et al. are fully aware of the methods we have used. Attempting FMV in a nonapneic patient would have been considered as a fault in our standards. In operating room settings, there are very few if any indications for FMV in nonapneic elective patients requiring tracheal intubation. Mechanically-assisted nonin-vasive facemask spontaneous ventilation has been used in some morbidly obese patients but only while awake. These patients were returned to mechanically noninvasive, fully controlled ventilation as soon as spontaneous ventilation ceased. Moreover, we believe that maintaining spontaneous ventilation at induction may correlate with poor anesthesia quality associated with maintained airway protective reflex that was shown to increase the difficulty of conventional airway management maneuvers. Because these reflexes are resistant to deepening of anesthesia, defense and protective reflex may persist after loss of spontaneous ventilation if muscle relaxants are not administered.3 These observations are strong arguments for managing the airway of patien...
机译:我们感谢薛等人。和Shetty等。他们为回应我们最近的文章而发送的有趣信。我们完全同意薛等人的第一句话。我们没有提供方案中使用的麻醉诱导方法。但是,我们认为我们的方法足够清晰,可以避免对归纳技术产生任何疑问。所有成年患者均接受适当剂量的阿片类药物和催眠药(在大多数情况下分别为舒芬太尼和丙泊酚)静脉推注。在我国,吸入麻醉在成人中并不普遍。此外,所有患者均接受了神经肌肉阻滞剂。我们刻意规范麻醉程序,以防止麻醉质量差影响气道管理质量。仅在临床和仪器上均确认麻醉深度和呼吸暂停状态时,才尝试使用口罩通气(FMV)。我们对薛等人充满信心。完全了解我们使用的方法。在非呼吸暂停患者中尝试FMV被认为是我们标准中的错误。在手术室中,需要气管插管的非呼吸性择期患者很少有FMV适应症。机械辅助的无创口罩自发通气已用于一些病态肥胖的患者中,但仅在清醒时使用。自发通气停止后,这些患者立即恢复机械无创通气。此外,我们认为在诱导时保持自发通气可能与维持气道保护反射相关的麻醉质量差有关,这被证明增加了常规气道管理操作的难度。由于这些反射对麻醉的加深有抵抗力,因此如果不使用肌肉松弛剂,则自发通气丧失后,防御和保护性反射可能会持续。3这些观察结果是控制患者呼吸道的有力证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号