机译:采用径向进入和结果对经皮冠状动脉介入的股骨通路的比较,来自国家心血管数据登记处的更新报告(2007-2012)
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital Department of Medicine 520 E 70th;
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital Department of Medicine 520 E 70th;
Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC United States;
Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO United States;
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital Department of Medicine 520 E 70th;
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital Department of Medicine 520 E 70th;
Weill Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian Hospital Department of Medicine 520 E 70th;
University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora United States;
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases Mayo Clinic Jacksonville FL United States;
Division of Cardiac Interventions Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York New York;
Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN United States;
Department of Medicine Heart South Cardiovascular Group University of Alabama at Birmingham;
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Hospital Miami FL United;
Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute M.S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey PA United States;
Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC United States;
Hemmorhage; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Radial artery; Vascular complication;
机译:采用径向进入和结果对经皮冠状动脉介入的股骨通路的比较,来自国家心血管数据登记处的更新报告(2007-2012)
机译:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术前出血风险范围内比较比伐卢定和radial动脉通路:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的分析
机译:径向与股骨经皮冠状动脉干预机之间的比较,印度尼西亚医院,2017-2018:国家登记处的一项潜在观察研究
机译:59,000 pcis临床登记处的经皮冠状动脉干预结果的性别差异。
机译:径向经皮冠状动脉干预时代的程序体积:英国心血管干预学会注册管理机构分析
机译:印尼医院Indonesia动脉和股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗之间的比较2017-2018年:国家注册中心的前瞻性观察研究
机译:采用径向进入及结果对经皮冠状动脉介入的股权