...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Contemporary Presentation and Management of Valvular Heart Disease The EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II Survey
【24h】

Contemporary Presentation and Management of Valvular Heart Disease The EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II Survey

机译:瓣膜心脏病的当代展示与管理肺活结节目瓣膜心脏病II调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Valvular heart disease (VHD) is an important cause of mortality and morbidity and has been subject to important changes in management. The VHD II survey was designed by the EURObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology to analyze actual management of VHD and to compare practice with guidelines. Methods: Patients with severe native VHD or previous valvular intervention were enrolled prospectively across 28 countries over a 3-month period in 2017. Indications for intervention were considered concordant if the intervention was performed or scheduled in symptomatic patients, corresponding to Class I recommendations specified in the 2012 European Society of Cardiology and in the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology VHD guidelines. Results: A total of 7247 patients (4483 hospitalized, 2764 outpatients) were included in 222 centers. Median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 62-80 years); 1917 patients (26.5%) were >= 80 years; and 3416 were female (47.1%). Severe native VHD was present in 5219 patients (72.0%): aortic stenosis in 2152 (41.2% of native VHD), aortic regurgitation in 279 (5.3%), mitral stenosis in 234 (4.5%), mitral regurgitation in 1114 (21.3%; primary in 746 and secondary in 368), multiple left-sided VHD in 1297 (24.9%), and right-sided VHD in 143 (2.7%). Two thousand twenty-eight patients (28.0%) had undergone previous valvular intervention. Intervention was performed in 37.0% and scheduled in 26.8% of patients with native VHD. The decision for intervention was concordant with Class I recommendations in symptomatic patients with severe single left-sided native VHD in 79.4% (95% CI, 77.1-81.6) for aortic stenosis, 77.6% (95% CI, 69.9-84.0) for aortic regurgitation, 68.5% (95% CI, 60.8-75.4) for mitral stenosis, and 71.0% (95% CI, 66.4-75.3) for primary mitral regurgitation. Valvular interventions were performed in 2150 patients during the survey; of them, 47.8% of patients with single left-sided native VHD were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. Transcatheter procedures were performed in 38.7% of patients with aortic stenosis and 16.7% of those with mitral regurgitation. Conclusions: Despite good concordance between Class I recommendations and practice in patients with aortic VHD, the suboptimal number in mitral VHD and late referral for valvular interventions suggest the need to improve further guideline implementation.
机译:背景:瓣膜心脏病(VHD)是死亡率和发病率的重要原因,并受到管理的重要变化。 VHD II调查是由欧洲心脏病学会的欧元产权研究计划来分析VHD的实际管理,并与准则进行比较。方法:患有严重的天然VHD或以前的阀门干预患者在2017年的3个月内,在28个国家进行了前瞻性地招募了28个国家。如果干预在症状患者中进行或安排的症状,对应于我的症状患者进行了一致的干预迹象2012年欧洲心脏病学会和2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学VHD指南。结果:共有7247名患者(4483名住院治疗,2764名门诊,222个中心。中位年龄为71岁(四分位数,62-80岁); 1917例患者(26.5%)> = 80年; 3416是女性(47.1%)。 5219名患者中存在严重的天然VHD(72.0%):2152中的主动脉狭窄(占天然VHD的41.2%),279例(5.3%)的主动脉反流,二尖瓣狭窄在1114(4.5.3%)(21.3%) ;初级在746和368中的二次),1297年的多个左侧VHD(24.9%),143中的右侧VHD(2.7%)。两千二十八名患者(28.0%)经历了先前的阀门干预。干预以37.0%的时间进行,并计划在26.8%的天然VHD患者中进行。干预的决定与症状患者的I类建议一致,在79.4%(95%CI,77.1-81.6)中,用于主动脉狭窄,77.6%(95%CI,69.9-84.0)进行主动脉二尖瓣狭窄的重新改性,68.5%(95%CI,60.8-75.4),初级二尖瓣重新改性为71.0%(95%CI,66.4-75.3)。在调查期间,在2150名患者中进行了瓣膜干预措施;其中,47.8%的单一左侧天然VHD的患者在纽约心脏关联III级或IV。经转截管程序以38.7%的主动脉狭窄的患者进行,16.7%的二尖瓣反流。结论:尽管I级患者主动脉VHD患者的建议和实践之间良好的一致性,但二尖瓣VHD的次优数和对阀门的干预措施的次优数表明需要改进进一步的准则实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号