...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease The COMPASS Trial
【24h】

Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin in Patients With Heart Failure and Chronic Coronary or Peripheral Artery Disease The COMPASS Trial

机译:Rivaroxaban有或没有阿司匹林患者心力衰竭和慢性冠状动脉或外周动脉疾病指南针试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and history of heart failure (HF) are at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. We explored the effects of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in these patients. Methods: The COMPASS trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) randomized 27 395 participants with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease to rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus aspirin 100 mg daily, rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily alone, or aspirin 100 mg alone. Patients with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV HF or left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) = 40% (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; P for interaction 0.36). The excess hazard for major bleeding was not different in participants with HF (2.5% versus 1.8%; HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88-2.09) than in those without HF (3.3% versus 1.9%; HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.45-2.21; P for interaction 0.26). There were no significant differences in the primary outcomes with rivaroxaban alone. Conclusions: In patients with chronic coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease and a history of mild or moderate HF, combination rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin alone produces similar relative but larger absolute benefits than in those without HF.
机译:背景:慢性冠状动脉疾病或外周枢动疾病患者和心力衰竭历史(HF)是主要不良心血管事件的高风险。我们探讨了rivaroxaban在这些患者中有没有阿司匹林的影响。方法:Compass试验(使用抗凝策略的人心血管结果)随机分配27 395名与慢性冠状动脉疾病或外周血动脉疾病的参与者对罗昔巴坎2.5毫克每日两次,每日蓖麻蓖麻油5毫克,或阿司匹林100毫克独自的。纽约心脏关联功能型III型或IV HF或左心室喷射级分(EF)= 40%(HR,0.81; 95%CI,0.67-0.98; P用于相互作用0.36)。 HF的参与者的主要出血的过度危害与1.8%对1.8%的2.5%; HR,1.36; 95%CI,0.88-2.09)而不是HF的参考者(3.3%,与1.9%; HR,1.79; 95% CI,1.45-2.21; p用于交互0.26)。单独使用罗瓦索巴班的主要结果没有显着差异。结论:在慢性冠状动脉疾病或外周枢动疾病的患者和温和或中度HF的历史中,与阿司匹林相比,与阿司匹林相比,与阿司匹林相比,蓖麻毒素和阿司匹林相比产生了类似但较大的绝对益处,而不是没有HF的那些。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号