首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >E-mail as the Appropriate Method of Communication for the Decision-Maker When Soliciting Advice for an Intellective Decision Task
【24h】

E-mail as the Appropriate Method of Communication for the Decision-Maker When Soliciting Advice for an Intellective Decision Task

机译:电子邮件作为向决策者寻求智能决策任务建议时适当的沟通方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For many problems in operating room and anesthesia group management, there are tasks with optimal decisions, and yet experienced personnel tend to make decisions that are worse or no better than random chance. Such decisions include staff scheduling, case scheduling, moving cases among operating rooms, and choosing patient arrival times. In such settings, operating room management leadership decision-making should typically be autocratic rather than participative. Autocratic-style decision-making calls for managers to solicit and consider feedback from stakeholders in the decision outcome but to make the decision themselves using their expert knowledge and the facts received. For this to be effective, often the manager will obtain expert advice from outside the organization (e.g., health system). In this narrative review, we evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using prompt asynchronous written communication (i.e., e-mail) as a communication channel for such interaction between a decision-maker (manager) and advisor. A detailed Appendix (Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/AA/B72) lists each observational and experimental result. We find that the current ubiquitous role of e-mail for such communication is appropriate. Its benefits include improved time management via asynchronicity, low cognitive load (e.g., relative to Web conferencing), the ability to hide undesirable and irrelevant cues (e.g., physical appearance), the appropriateness of adding desirable cues (e.g., titles and degrees), the opportunity to provide written expression of confidence, and the ability for the advisor to demonstrate the answer for the decision-maker. Given that the manager is e-mailing an advisor whose competence the manager trusts, it is unnecessary to use a richer communication channel to develop trust. Finally, many of the limitations of e-mail can be rectified through training. We expect that decades from now, e-mail (i.e., asynchronous writing) between an expert and decision-maker will remain the dominant means of communication for intellective tasks.
机译:对于手术室和麻醉小组管理中的许多问题,有些任务具有最佳决策,但是经验丰富的人员往往会做出比随机机会差或更糟的决策。此类决策包括人员调度,案件调度,在手术室之间移动案件以及选择患者到达时间。在这种情况下,手术室管理领导者的决策通常应该是专制的,而不是参与式的。专制式的决策要求管理者在决策结果中征求并考虑利益相关者的反馈,但要利用他们的专业知识和所收到的事实自行做出决策。为了使之有效,经理通常会从组织外部(例如,卫生系统)获得专家建议。在这篇叙述性评论中,我们评估了使用即时异步书面交流(即电子邮件)作为决策者(经理)和顾问之间这种互动的交流渠道的优缺点。详细的附录(补充数字内容,http://links.lww.com/AA/B72)列出了每种观察和实验结果。我们发现,目前电子邮件在此类通信中无处不在的作用是适当的。它的好处包括通过异步性改善时间管理,降低认知负荷(例如相对于Web会议),隐藏不想要的和不相关的线索(例如物理外观),添加期望的线索(例如标题和学位)的适当性,提供书面表达信心的机会,以及顾问向决策者展示答案的能力。假设经理正在通过电子邮件向其信任的顾问发送电子邮件,则无需使用更丰富的沟通渠道来建立信任。最后,可以通过培训来纠正电子邮件的许多局限性。我们希望从现在开始的几十年中,专家和决策者之间的电子邮件(即异步编写)将仍然是智能任务的主要通信手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号