首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Neuraxial anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: An overview of cochrane systematic reviews
【24h】

Neuraxial anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: An overview of cochrane systematic reviews

机译:神经外科麻醉预防术后死亡率和重大疾病:Cochrane系统评价概述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:: This analysis summarized Cochrane reviews that assess the effects of neuraxial anesthesia on perioperative rates of death, chest infections, and myocardial infarction. METHODS:: A search was performed in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on July 13, 2012. We have included all Cochrane systematic reviews that examined subjects of any age undergoing any type of surgical (open or endoscopic) procedure, compared neuraxial anesthesia to general anesthesia alone for the surgical anesthesia, or neuraxial anesthesia plus general anesthesia to general anesthesia alone for the surgical anesthesia, and included death, chest infections, myocardial infarction, and/or serious adverse events as outcomes. Studies included in these reviews were selected on the same criteria. RESULTS:: Nine Cochrane reviews were selected for this overview. Their scores on the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire varied from 4 to 6 of a maximal possible score of 7. Compared with general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia reduced the 0- to-30-day mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.94; I = 0%) based on 20 studies that included 3006 participants. Neuraxial anesthesia also decreased the risk of pneumonia (RR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79; I = 0%) based on 5 studies that included 400 participants. No difference was detected in the risk of myocardial infarction between the 2 techniques (RR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.57-2.37; I = 0%) based on 6 studies with 849 participants. Compared with general anesthesia alone, adding neuraxial anesthesia to general anesthesia did not affect the 0- to-30-day mortality (RR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.76-1.51; I = 0%) based on 18 studies with 3228 participants. No difference was detected in the risk of myocardial infarction between combined neuraxial anesthesia-general anesthesia and general anesthesia alone (RR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.44-1.09; I = 0%) based on 8 studies that included 1580 participants. Adding a neuraxial anesthesia to general anesthesia reduced the risk of pneumonia (RR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98; I = 9%) after adjustment for publication bias and based on 9 studies that included 2433 participants. The quality of the evidence was judged as moderate for all 6 comparisons. The quality of the reporting score of complications related to neuraxial blocks was 9 (4 to 12 [median {range}]) for a possible maximum score of 14. CONCLUSIONS:: Compared with general anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia may reduce the 0-to-30-day mortality for patients undergoing a surgery with an intermediate-to-high cardiac risk (level of evidence moderate). Large randomized controlled trials on the difference in death and major outcomes between regional and general anesthesia are required.
机译:背景::该分析总结了Cochrane综述,评估了神经麻醉对围手术期死亡率,胸部感染和心肌梗塞的影响。方法:2012年7月13日在Cochrane系统评价数据库中进行了搜索。我们纳入了所有Cochrane系统评价,该系统评价检查了接受任何类型的外科手术(开放式或内窥镜式)的任何年龄的受试者,将神经麻醉与一般手术麻醉时单独使用麻醉,或神经外科麻醉加全身麻醉时单独使用全身麻醉,包括死亡,胸部感染,心肌梗塞和/或严重不良事件作为预后。这些评论中包含的研究均以相同的标准进行选择。结果::本概述选择了9条Cochrane评价。他们在“概述质量评估问卷”上的得分从4到6(最高可能得分为7)不等。与全身麻醉相比,神经麻醉降低了0至30天的死亡率(风险比[RR]为0.71; 95%置信区间[CI],0.53-0.94; I = 0%)基于20项研究,其中包括3006名参与者。根据包括400名参与者的5项研究,神经外科麻醉还降低了肺炎的风险(RR 0.45; 95%CI,0.26-0.79; I = 0%)。根据对849名参与者的6项研究,两种技术之间没有发现心肌梗塞风险的差异(RR 1.17; 95%CI,0.57-2.37; I = 0%)。与单独进行全身麻醉相比,在18项针对3228名参与者的研究中,在全身麻醉中增加神经麻醉不会影响0至30天的死亡率(RR 1.07; 95%CI,0.76-1.51; I = 0%)。基于包括1580名参与者的8项研究,在联合神经麻醉和全身麻醉与仅全身麻醉之间未发现心肌梗塞风险的差异(RR 0.69; 95%CI,0.44-1.09; I = 0%)。调整发表偏倚后,并根据9名研究(包括2433名参与者),在全麻后加神经麻醉可以降低肺炎的风险(RR 0.69; 95%CI,0.49-0.98; I = 9%)。所有6个比较的证据质量均被判定为中等。报告的与神经阻滞相关的并发症的评分质量为9(4到12 [中位数[范围}]),最高评分为14。结论:与全身麻醉相比,神经麻醉可以降低从0到患有中度至高心脏风险(证据水平中等)的手术患者的30天死亡率。需要关于区域麻醉和全身麻醉之间死亡和主要结局差异的大型随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号