首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesiology >Comparison of standard polyvinyl chloride tracheal tubes and straight reinforced tracheal tubes for tracheal intubation through different sizes of the Airtraq laryngoscope in anesthetized and paralyzed patients: a randomized prospective study.
【24h】

Comparison of standard polyvinyl chloride tracheal tubes and straight reinforced tracheal tubes for tracheal intubation through different sizes of the Airtraq laryngoscope in anesthetized and paralyzed patients: a randomized prospective study.

机译:麻醉和瘫痪患者中通过不同尺寸的Airtraq喉镜进行气管插管的标准聚氯乙烯气管导管和直管式气管导管的比较:一项随机前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The authors compared the intubation success rate of straight reinforced tracheal tubes emerging from the Airtraq laryngoscope (Prodol Meditec S.A., Vizcaya, Spain) with standard preformed polyvinyl chloride tracheal tubes in anesthetized patients. METHODS: The authors randomly allocated 347 adult patients to be intubated with standard polyvinyl chloride tracheal tubes, standard straight wire-reinforced tracheal tubes, or silicone straight wire-reinforced tubes, through either the larger or the smaller adult laryngoscope sizes. The possible influence of laryngoscope size, tube size, and tube type on intubation failure was examined. RESULTS: Success rates were 100% for polyvinyl chloride tracheal tubes, 78.5% for standard wire-reinforced tracheal tubes, and 75.4% for silicone wire-reinforced tubes (P < 0.01). Compared with the former, patients in the straight standard and silicone wire-reinforced tube groups required more optimization maneuvers (4.1% vs. 42.1%; P < 0.01) and more attempts at successful intubation (0% vs. 7.3%; P < 0.01). The angle created by the tube emerging from the Airtraq guiding channel was inversely correlated to the ratio of the endotracheal tube OD to the width of the channel in the standard and silicone wire-reinforced tube groups (r = -0.95 and r = -0.82, respectively; P < 0.01). Finally, a decrease in 0.1 of the above ratio was associated with a 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-5.2; P < 0.01) times increase in the odds ratio of intubation failure. CONCLUSIONS: Standard polyvinyl chloride tracheal tubes were found to be superior compared with standard and silicone straight wire-reinforced tubes for intubation through the Airtraq laryngoscope. In the latter groups, a decrease of the ratio of their OD to the width of the Airtraq guiding channel resulted in increased intubation failure.
机译:背景:作者比较了从Airtraq喉镜(Prodol Meditec S.A.,西班牙比斯开,西班牙)出来的笔直加强型气管导管与标准预成型的聚氯乙烯气管导管在麻醉患者中的插管成功率。方法:作者随机分配了347名成年患者,分别通过较大或较小的成人喉镜插入标准的聚氯乙烯气管导管,标准的直金属丝增强气管导管或硅胶直的金属丝增强导管。检查了喉镜尺寸,管子尺寸和管子类型对插管失败的可能影响。结果:聚氯乙烯气管导管的成功率为100%,标准钢丝增强气管导管的成功率为78.5%,硅树脂钢丝增强管的成功率为75.4%(P <0.01)。与前者相比,标准直管和硅胶线加强管组的患者需要更多的优化操作(4.1%对42.1%; P <0.01)和更多的成功插管尝试(0%对7.3%; P <0.01 )。从Airtraq引导通道中出来的导管所产生的角度与气管内导管OD与标准和硅胶线增强导管组中导管宽度的比值成反比(r = -0.95和r = -0.82,分别; P <0.01)。最后,插管失败几率的3.1倍(95%置信区间,1.9-5.2; P <0.01)与上述比率的降低相关。结论:发现标准的聚氯乙烯气管导管比标准的和硅胶的钢丝直管通过Airtraq喉镜插管更好。在后一组中,其外径与Airtraq引导通道的宽度之比降低导致插管失败增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号