首页> 外文期刊>Chemistry: A European journal >Distance versus Capillary Flow Dynamics-Based Detection Methods on a Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Device (μPAD)
【24h】

Distance versus Capillary Flow Dynamics-Based Detection Methods on a Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Device (μPAD)

机译:基于微流体纸的分析装置(μPAD)的基于毛细血管流动动力学的距离与毛细管流动动力学的检测方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, there has been high interest in paper-based microfluidic sensors or microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) towards low-cost, portable, and easy-to-use sensing for chemical and biological targets. μPAD allows spontaneous liquid flow without any external or internal pumping, as well as an innate filtration capability. Although both optical (colorimetric and fluorescent) and electrochemical detection have been demonstrated on μPADs, several limitations still remain, such as the need for additional equipment, vulnerability to ambient lighting perturbation, and inferior sensitivity. Herein, alternative detection methods on mPADs are reviewed to resolve these issues, including relatively well studied distance-based measurements and the newer capillary flow dynamics-based method. Detection principles, assay performance, strengths, and weaknesses are explained for these methods, along with their potential future applications towards point-of-care medical diagnostics and other field-based applications.
机译:近年来,对基于纸质的微流体传感器或基于微流体纸的分析装置(μPAD)的高成本,便携式,易于使用的化学和生物学靶标的感测。 μPAD允许自发液体流动,无需任何外部或内部泵送,以及先天过滤能力。尽管在μPAD上证明了光学(比色和荧光)和电化学检测,但仍然存在若干限制,例如需要额外的设备,对环境照明扰动的脆弱性和较差的敏感性。这里,审查MPADS上的替代检测方法以解决这些问题,包括基于距离的距离的测量和基于较新的毛细血管流动动力学的方法。对这些方法解释了检测原理,测定性能,优势和缺点,以及它们对护理点医疗诊断和其他基于场的应用的未来应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号