...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >The diagnostic value of the upper lip bite test combined with sternomental distance, thyromental distance, and interincisor distance for prediction of easy laryngoscopy and intubation: a prospective study.
【24h】

The diagnostic value of the upper lip bite test combined with sternomental distance, thyromental distance, and interincisor distance for prediction of easy laryngoscopy and intubation: a prospective study.

机译:上唇咬合试验结合胸骨距离,胸膜距离和门齿距离的诊断价值对预测喉镜和插管的易行性:一项前瞻性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of upper lip bite test (ULBT) has been compared with the Mallampati classification. In this study, we investigated whether the combination of the ULBT classification with sternomental distance (SMD), thyromental distance (TMD), and interincisor distance (IID) or a composite score can improve the ability to predict easy laryngoscopy and intubation compared with each test alone. METHODS: In a prospective study, 380 patients who were scheduled for elective surgery were selected randomly and enrolled in the study. Before inducing anesthesia, the airways were assessed, and ULBT class, SMD, TMD, and IID determined. Laryngoscopic view according to the Cormack and Lehane grading system was determined after induction of anesthesia and Grades 3 and 4 defined as difficult intubation. best cutoff points of the tests were calculated. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of these tests and their combinations with the ULBT were calculated. RESULTS: The prevalence of difficult intubation was 5% (n = 19). Class III ULBT, IID <4.5 cm, TMD <6.5 cm, and SMD <13 cm were defined as predictors of difficult intubation. There was no significant difference regarding difficult intubation based on gender (P < 0.05), whereas there were significant differences between the older tests and laryngeal view (P < 0.05, Mc-Nemar test). Specificity and accuracy of the ULBT were significantly higher than TMD, SMD, and IID individually (specificity was 91.69%, 82.27%, 70.64%, and 82.27%, respectively, and accuracy was 91.05%, 71.32%, 81.84%, and 76.58%, respectively). The combination of the ULBT with SMD provided the highest sensitivity. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the specificity and accuracy of the ULBT is significantly higher than the other tests and is more accurate in airway assessment. However, the ULBT in conjunction with the other tests could more reliably predict easy laryngoscopy or intubation.
机译:背景:上唇咬伤测试(ULBT)的准确性已与Mallampati分类进行了比较。在这项研究中,我们调查了将ULBT分类与胸膜间距离(SMD),胸膜间距离(TMD)和门齿间距离(IID)或综合评分相结合是否可以提高预测每个喉镜和插管的易行性的能力单独。方法:在一项前瞻性研究中,随机选择了计划进行择期手术的380例患者并纳入研究。在进行麻醉之前,先对气道进行评估,并确定ULBT等级,SMD,TMD和IID。麻醉诱导后确定根据Cormack和Lehane分级系统的喉镜视图,并将3级和4级定义为困难插管。计算了测试的最佳截止点。最后,计算了这些测试及其与ULBT的组合的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值和准确性。结果:困难插管的患病率为5%(n = 19)。 III级ULBT,IID <4.5 cm,TMD <6.5 cm和SMD <13 cm被定义为插管困难的预测指标。基于性别的困难插管没有显着差异(P <0.05),而较早的测试与喉镜检查之间存在显着差异(P <0.05,Mc-Nemar测试)。 ULBT的特异性和准确性分别显着高于TMD,SMD和IID(特异性分别为91.69%,82.27%,70.64%和82.27%,准确性为91.05%,71.32%,81.84%和76.58% , 分别)。 ULBT与SMD的组合提供了最高的灵敏度。结论:我们得出结论,ULBT的特异性和准确性显着高于其他测试,并且在气道评估中更为准确。但是,ULBT结合其他测试可以更可靠地预测容易的喉镜检查或插管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号