...
首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial

机译:全膝关节置换术后局部浸润镇痛与鞘内注射吗啡的术后疼痛处理:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA)-using a combination of local anesthetics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and epinephrine, injected periarticularly during surgery-has become popular in postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared intrathecal morphine with LIA after TKA. Methods: In this double-blind study, 50 patients scheduled to undergo TKA under spinal anesthesia were randomized into 2 groups: group M, 0.1 mg morphine was injected intrathecally together with the spinal anesthetic and in group L, LIA using ropivacaine, ketorolac, and epinephrine was infiltrated in the knee during the operation, and 2 bolus injections of the same mixture were given via an intraarticular catheter postoperatively. Postoperative pain, rescue analgesic requirements, mobilization, and home readiness were recorded. Patient-assessed health quality was recorded using the Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5D during 3 months follow-up. The primary endpoint was IV morphine consumption the first 48 postoperative hours. Results: Mean morphine consumption was significantly lower in group L than in group M during the first 48 postoperative hours: 26 ± 15 vs 54 ± 29 mg, i.e., a mean difference for each 24-hour period of 14.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6 to 20.9) mg. Pain scores at rest and on movement were lower during the first 48 hours in group L than in group M (P < 0.001). Pain score was also lower when walking in group L than in group M at 24 hours and 48 hours postoperatively (P < 0.001). In group L, more patients were able to climb stairs at 24 hours: 50% (11 of 22) versus 4% (1 of 23), i.e., a difference of 46% (95% CI 23.5 to 68.5) and at 48 hours: 70% (16 of 23) versus 22% (5 of 23), i.e., a difference of 48% (95% CI 23 to 73). Median (range) time to fulfillment of discharge criteria was shorter in group L than in group M, 51 (24-166) hours versus 72 (51-170) hours. The difference was 23 (95% CI 18 to 42) hours (P = 0.001). Length of hospital stay was also shorter in group L than in group M: median (range) 3 (2-17) versus 4 (2-14) days (P = 0.029). Patient satisfaction was greater in group L than in group M (P = 0.001), but no differences were found in knee function, side effects, or in patient-related outcomes, Oxford Knee score, or EQ-5D. Conclusions: LIA technique provided better postoperative analgesia and earlier mobilization, resulting in shorter hospital stay, than did intrathecal morphine after TKA.
机译:背景:局部渗透镇痛(LIA)-在手术期间经关节周围注射局部麻醉药,非甾体抗炎药和肾上腺素的组合-已在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的术后疼痛管理中流行。我们比较了TKA后鞘内注射吗啡和LIA。方法:在该双盲研究中,将计划在脊柱麻醉下接受TKA的50例患者随机分为2组:M组,0.1mg吗啡与脊髓麻醉剂一起鞘内注射; L,LIA组采用罗哌卡因,酮咯酸和肾上腺素在手术过程中渗入膝盖,术后通过关节内导管两次推注相同的混合物。记录术后疼痛,急救镇痛要求,动员和入院准备情况。在三个月的随访中,使用牛津膝关节评分和EQ-5D记录了患者评估的健康质量。主要终点是术后48小时内静脉注射吗啡。结果:L组在术后48小时内的平均吗啡消耗量显着低于M组:26±15 vs 54±29 mg,即,每24小时的平均差异为14.2(95%置信区间[ CI] 7.6至20.9)mg。 L组在最初48小时内的静止和运动疼痛评分低于M组(P <0.001)。术后24小时和48小时,L组行走时的疼痛评分也低于M组(P <0.001)。在L组中,更多的患者能够在24小时爬楼梯:50%(22个中的11个)与4%(23个中的1个)的攀爬,即在48小时时相差46%(95%CI 23.5至68.5) :70%(23之16)与22%(23之5)的差异,即相差48%(95%CI 23至73)。 L组中达到放电标准的中位(范围)时间比M组中的短(51(24-166)小时)比M组中的72(51-170)小时要短。差异为23(95%CI 18至42)小时(P = 0.001)。 L组的住院时间也比M组短:中位(范围)为3(2-17)天与4(2-14)天(P = 0.029)。 L组患者的满意度高于M组(P = 0.001),但在膝关节功能,副作用或与患者相关的结局,牛津膝关节评分或EQ-5D方面无差异。结论:与TKA术后鞘内注射吗啡相比,LIA技术可提供更好的术后镇痛和早期动员,缩短住院时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号