首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and Analgesia: Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society >Clinical investigation of neuraxially administered drugs: a regulatory perspective.
【24h】

Clinical investigation of neuraxially administered drugs: a regulatory perspective.

机译:神经外用药物的临床研究:监管观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article "Neostigmine decreases bupivacaine use by patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized controlled study" by Ross et al., which appears in this issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia, discusses a clinical trial that assessed the bupivacaine-sparing properties of neostigmine. As stated in the article, the authors are the sponsors of an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for the intrathecal administration of neostigmine; however, in the study cited above, neostigmine was administered via an epidural route. We will briefly address the regulatory aspects involved in the submission of an IND for neuraxially administered drugs, including a discussion of whether the safety information contained in an IND permitting drug administration via the intrathecal route may be applied to drug administration via the epidural route.
机译:Ross等人的文章“ Neostigmine降低了分娩期间患者控制的硬膜外镇痛对布比卡因的使用:一项随机对照研究”,该期刊发表在《麻醉与镇痛》杂志上,该文章讨论了评估新斯的明的保留布比卡因特性的临床试验。 。如文章所述,作者是鞘内注射新斯的明的研究用新药(IND)申请的发起人。然而,在上述研究中,新斯的明通过硬膜外途径给药。我们将简要介绍涉及神经外用药物的IND提交所涉及的监管方面,包括讨论允许鞘内途径给药的IND中所包含的安全性信息是否可以通过硬膜外途径应用于药物给药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号