...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.
【24h】

Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.

机译:汇集分析液体基础细胞学在中国人口宫颈癌筛查研究中的性能分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been widely used for cervical cancer screening. Despite numerous studies and systematic reviews, to the authors' knowledge few large studies to date have focused on biopsy-confirmed cervical lesions and controversy remains concerning its diagnostic accuracy. The objective of the current study was to assess LBC for detecting biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer.A pooled analysis of LBC using data from 13 population-based, cross-sectional, cervical cancer screening studies performed in China from 1999 to 2008 was performed. Participants (n = 26,782) received LBC and human papillomavirus testing. Women found to be positive on screening were referred for colposcopy and biopsy. The accuracy of LBC for detecting biopsy-confirmed CIN of type 2 or worse (CIN2+) as well as CIN type 3 or worse (CIN3+) lesions was analyzed.Of 25,830 women included in the analysis, CIN2+ was found in 107 of 2612 with atypical squamous cells (4.1%), 142 of 923 with low-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (15.4%), 512 of 784 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (65.3%), 29 of 30 with squamous cell carcinoma (96.7%), 4 of 27 with atypical glandular cells (14.8%), and 85 of 21,454 with normal cytology results (0.4%). No invasive cancers were found to have atypical squamous cells, atypical glandular cells, or cytologically normal slides. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of LBC for detecting CIN2+ were 81.0%, 95.4%, 38.3%, 99.3 %, and 94.9%, respectively. Although Hybrid Capture 2 was more sensitive than LBC, the specificity, positive predictive value, and overall accuracy of LBC were higher than those of Hybrid Capture2 at 85.2%, 18.6%, and 85.5%, respectively.The results of the current study indicate that the performance of LBC can effectively predict the risk of existing CIN2+ and may be a good screening tool for cervical cancer prevention in a developing country.
机译:基于液体的细胞学(LBC)已广泛用于宫颈癌筛选。尽管有许多研究和系统的审查,对于作者的知识,迄今为止迄今为止的大型研究尤其专注于活组织检查证实的宫颈病变和争议仍然涉及其诊断准确性。目前的研究目的是评估LBC检测活检证实的宫颈上皮内瘤瘤(CIN)和癌症。使用来自1999年的13名群体,横截面,宫颈癌筛查研究的数据汇集了LBC的分析到2008年进行了。参与者(n = 26,782)接受了LBC和人乳头瘤病毒检测。发现在筛查中被发现是阳性的妇女被提及阴道镜检查和活组织检查。分析了用于检测2型或更差(CIN2 +)的活检确认的CIN的LBC的准确性以及CIN型3或更差异(CIN3 +)病变。分析中包含的25,830名妇女,CIN2 +在2612中发现有非典型鳞状细胞(4.1%),142 of 923,具有低级鳞状上皮内瘤形成(15.4%),512,784,含有高级鳞状上皮瘤(65.3%),其中29个,共30个,鳞状细胞癌(96.7%),4 27例,具有非典型腺体细胞(14.8%)和85个,共21,454例,具有正常的细胞学结果(0.4%)。没有发现任何侵入性癌症具有非典型鳞状细胞,非典型腺细胞或细胞正常载玻片。用于检测CIN2 +的LBC的总灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和准确性分别为81.0%,95.4%,38.3%,99.3%和94.9%。虽然杂化捕获2比LBC更敏感,但LBC的特异性,阳性预测值和总体准确性分别高出85.2%,18.6%和85.5%的杂交捕获2。目前的研究结果表明LBC的性能可以有效地预测现有CIN2 +的风险,并且可能是发展中国家宫颈癌预防的良好筛查工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号