...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Welfare >Veterinary certificates for emergency or casualty slaughter bovine animals in the Republic of Ireland: are the welfare needs of certified animals adequately protected?
【24h】

Veterinary certificates for emergency or casualty slaughter bovine animals in the Republic of Ireland: are the welfare needs of certified animals adequately protected?

机译:爱尔兰共和国紧急或伤亡屠宰牛只的动物证书:经过认证的动物的福利需求是否得到充分保护?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All emergency and casualty bovines in the Republic of Ireland that are deemed to be fit for human consumption must be accompanied to the slaughterhouse by an official veterinary certificate (VC). Cullinane et al (2010) conducted a review of bovine cases consigned under veterinary certification to emergency (ES) and casualty (CS) slaughter in the Republic of Ireland during 2006 to 2008. The current paper further evaluates these results, with emphasis on the period of validity, transport distance and transport conditions, and considers whether the current VC adequately protects welfare. Of 1,255 veterinary certificates, the median time between certification and slaughter was 1 (minimum 0, maximum 452) day, with one-fifth in excess of three days. The median straight-line distance between farm and slaughterhouse was 22 km; 82 and 98% study animals were transported distances of no more than 40 and 100 km, respectively. In 27% of VCs, no slaughterhouse was designated; hence the transport distance was not limited. In 77% of all cases, the disability/injury was related to the locomotor system, including 35% with limb fractures. Veterinary certification of the latter as being fit for transport appears to have been in contravention of animal transport and welfare legislation. The welfare of animals would be improved if each VC included a certified period of validity. In future, veterinary certificates should state clearly a maximum period of validity between certification and slaughter, a maximum distance that the animal should be transported and a minimum level of comfort under which the animal must be transported. Historically, in the Republic of Ireland, there was no suitable non-transport alternative available to cattle producers wanting to salvage an otherwise healthy animal that had suffered an accident or injury resulting in acute pain. An alternative is now available, with the introduction of an on-farm emergency slaughter policy.
机译:爱尔兰共和国内所有适合人类食用的紧急和伤亡牛,都必须附有官方兽医证书(VC)陪同屠宰场。 Cullinane等人(2010年)对爱尔兰共和国2006年至2008年间因紧急(ES)和伤亡(CS)屠宰而获得兽医证明的牛病例进行了审查。本论文进一步评估了这些结果,重点是时期有效性,运输距离和运输条件,并考虑当前的风险投资是否充分保护了福利。在1,255张兽医证书中,从认证到宰杀的平均时间为1天(最少0天,最多452天),其中三分之二超过三天。农场和屠宰场之间的平均直线距离为22公里; 82%和98%的研究动物的运输距离分别不超过40公里和100公里。在27%的VC中,没有指定屠宰场。因此,运输距离不受限制。在所有病例中,有77%的残疾/伤害与运动系统有关,包括35%的肢体骨折。后者的兽医证明适合运输,似乎违反了动物运输和福利法。如果每个风险投资都包含一个有效期的证明,将改善动物的福利。将来,兽医证书应明确规定认证和屠宰之间的最长有效期,运输动物的最大距离以及运输动物的最小舒适度。从历史上看,在爱尔兰共和国,没有合适的非运输替代品可供想要挽救遭受事故或伤害并导致急性疼痛的健康动物的养牛者使用。随着农场紧急屠宰政策的出台,现在可以使用替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号