首页> 外文期刊>Blood: The Journal of the American Society of Hematology >Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma
【24h】

Final analysis of survival outcomes in the phase 3 FIRST trial of up-front treatment for multiple myeloma

机译:阶段第3阶段对骨髓瘤升降治疗阶段的存活结果的最终分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This FIRST trial final analysis examined survival outcomes in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) treated with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous), Rd for 72 weeks (18 cycles; Rd18), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT; 72 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; primary comparison: Rd continuous vs MPT). Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint (final analysis prespecified = 60 months' follow-up). Patientswere randomized to Rd continuous (n = 535), Rd18 (n = 541), or MPT (n = 547). At a median follow-up of 67 months, PFS was significantly longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.79; P .00001) andwas similarly extended vs Rd18. Median OS was 10 months longer with Rd continuous vs MPT (59.1 vs 49.1 months; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92; P = .0023), and similar with Rd18 (62.3 months). In patients achieving complete or very good partial responses, Rd continuous had an approximate to 30-month longer median time to next treatment vs Rd18 (69.5 vs 39.9 months). Over half of all patients who received second-line treatment were given a bortezomib-based therapy. Second-line outcomes were improved in patients receiving bortezomib after Rd continuous and Rd18 vs after MPT. No new safety concerns, including risk for secondary malignancies, were observed. Treatment with Rd continuous significantly improved survival outcomes vsMPT, supporting Rd continuous as a standard of care for patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM.
机译:该第一次试验最终分析检查了用Lenalidomide和低剂量地塞米松治疗的移植术语新诊断的多种骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的存活结果直至疾病进展(RD连续),RD为72周(18次循环; RD18)或Melphalan ,泼尼松和沙利度胺(MPT; 72周)。主要终点是无进展的存活率(PFS;主要比较:RD连续VS MPT)。整体生存(OS)是一个关键的辅助端点(预先预期的最终分析& = 60个月后续行动)。患者随机分为RD连续(n = 535),RD18(n = 541)或MPT(n = 547)。在67个月的中位随访中,PFS与RD连续VS MPT(危险比[HR],0.69; 95%置信区间[CI],0.59-0.79; P& 0.59-0.79; P <.00001)以及类似地扩展VS RD18。中位数OS为RD连续VS MPT(59.1 vs 49.1月; HR,0.78; 95%CI,0.67-0.92; P = .0023),与RD18(62.3个月)相似。在实现完整或非常好的部分反应的患者中,RD连续的近似值达到30个月的时间较长的时间到下一次治疗与RD18(69.5 Vs 39.9个月)。所有接受二线治疗的患者的超过一半是基于Bortezomib的疗法。在RD连续和MPT后RD18 VS接受Bortezomib的患者中改善了二线结果。没有观察到新的安全问题,包括继发性恶性肿瘤的风险。用RD治疗持续显着提高存活结果VSMPT,支持RD作为移植缺陷患者的护理标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号