首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural Brain Research: An International Journal >Corticospinal control strategies underlying voluntary and involuntary wrist movements
【24h】

Corticospinal control strategies underlying voluntary and involuntary wrist movements

机译:志愿和非自愿手腕运动的皮质统计学控制策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The difference between voluntary and involuntary motor actions has been recognized since ancient times, but the nature of this difference remains unclear. We compared corticospinal influences at wrist positions established before and after voluntary motion with those established before and after involuntary motion elicited by sudden removal of a load (the unloading reflex). To minimize the effect of motoneuronal excitability on the evaluation of corticospinal influences, motor potentials from transcranial magnetic stimulation of the wrist motor cortex area were evoked during an EMG silent period produced by brief muscle shortening. The motoneuronal excitability was thus equalized at different wrist positions. Results showed that the unloading reflex was generated in the presence of a corticospinal drive, rather than autonomously by the spinal cord. Although the tonic EMG levels were substantially different, the corticospinal influences remained the same at the pre- and post-unloading wrist positions. These influences however changed when subjects voluntarily moved the wrist to another position. Previous studies showed that the corticospinal system sets the referent position (R) at which neuromuscular posture-stabilizing mechanisms begin to act. In self-initiated actions, the corticospinal system shifts the R to relay these mechanisms to a new posture, thus converting them from mechanisms resisting to those assisting motion. This solves the classical posture-movement problem. In contrast, by maintaining the R value constant, the corticospinal system relies on these posture-stabilizing mechanisms to allow involuntary responses to occur after unloading. Thus, central control strategies underlying the two types of motor actions are fundamentally different. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:自古以来,自愿和非自愿运动措施之间的差异已经认可,但这种差异的性质仍然不明确。我们比较了在自愿运动之前和之后建立的腕部阵地的皮质统计学影响与由突然去除负荷(卸载反射)引起的非自愿运动之前和之后的那些。为了最小化动力神经元兴奋性对皮质脊髓间影响评估的影响,在短暂的肌肉缩短产生的EMG沉默期间,唤起了来自腕部电机皮质区域的经颅磁刺激的电动机电位。因此,在不同的腕部位置等均匀化的动机兴奋性。结果表明,卸载反射在皮质脊髓驱动情况下,而不是由脊髓自主产生。虽然补品EMG水平基本上不同,但在卸载后腕部位置和后齿部的皮质脊髓影响仍然存在。然而,当受试者自愿将手腕移到另一个位置时,这些影响发生了变化。以前的研究表明,皮质螺旋系统设定了神经肌肉姿势稳定机制开始采取行动的参考位置(R)。在自我启动的动作中,皮质螺旋系统使R将这些机制转移到新的姿势,从而将它们从抵抗辅助运动的机制转换。这解决了经典的姿势运动问题。相反,通过保持R值常数,皮质脊髓系统依赖于这些姿势稳定机制,以允许在卸载后发生的非自愿反应。因此,两种电机行动的中央控制策略根本不同。 Crown版权所有(c)2012由elestvier b.v出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号