...
首页> 外文期刊>BioMed research international >Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults
【24h】

Evaluation of Two Methods for Determination of CD64 as a Diagnostic Marker of Infection in Critically Ill Adults

机译:评价两种测定CD64的方法作为批判性成年人感染诊断标志物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives. Diagnostic markers of infection have had little innovation over the last few decades. CD64, a marker expressed on the surface of neutrophils, may have utility for this purpose. Methods. This study was conducted in an adult intensive care unit (ICU) in Sao Paulo, Brazil, with 89 patients. We evaluated CD64 in patients with documented or clinically diagnosed infection (infection group) and controls (patients without any evidence of infection) by two different methodologies: method #1, an in house assay, and method #2, the commercial kit Leuko64 (Trillium Diagnostics). Results. CD64 displayed good discriminating power with a 91.2% sensitivity (95% CI 90.7-91.6%) for detecting infection. The commercial kit (Leuko64) demonstrated higher specificity (87.3%) compared with method #1 as well as better accuracy (88.8%). Conclusions. CD64 seems to be a promising marker of infection in the intensive care setting, with Leuko64 showing a slight advantage.
机译:目标。 在过去的几十年里,感染的诊断标记几乎没有创新。 CD64,在嗜中性粒细胞表面表达的标记物,可能具有效用以实现此目的。 方法。 该研究在巴西圣保罗的成人重症监护室(ICU)中进行,患有89名患者。 我们通过两种不同的方法评估了记录或临床诊断的感染(感染组)和对照(没有任何感染证据的患者的患者的CD64):方法#1,房屋测定和方法#2,商业套件Leuko64(Trillium 诊断)。 结果。 CD64显示出良好的辨别力,灵敏度为91.2%(95%CI 90.7-91.6%),用于检测感染。 商业套件(Leuko64)与方法#1相比,表现出更高的特异性(87.3%)以及更好的准确性(88.8%)。 结论。 CD64似乎是密集护理环境中感染的有希望的标志,Leuko64显示出略有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号