...
首页> 外文期刊>BioMed research international >Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Administration in Treating Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Administration in Treating Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:透明质酸给药在肩部粘性胶囊炎治疗中的有效性:对随机对照试验的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction. Adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder presents with an insidious onset of pain and progressive limitation of shoulder movement. Objectives. To investigate whether intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) administration alone is superior to conventional therapies and whether the addition of intra-articular HA administration to conventional therapies improves clinical outcomes in patients with AC. Methods. The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched without language restrictions in July 2014 with a priori defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results. Four randomized controlled trials (273 participants, 278 shoulders) were included in this review. Two trials compared intra-articular HA administration with conventional therapies and 2 trials evaluated intra-articular HA administration as an addition to conventional therapies. Pain and shoulder function/disability outcomes in the HA injection group were not superior to those achieved in the conventional therapy groups. No significant differences in pain or shoulder function/disability outcomes were noted between the groups with and without adjunctive HA administration. Conclusions. Intra-articular HA administration alone is not superior to conventional AC treatments, and the addition of intra-articular HA administration to conventional therapies does not provide significant added benefits. HA administration in AC patients who are receiving conventional therapies should be evaluated to avoid unnecessary medical expenditure.
机译:介绍。肩部胶囊(AC)肩膀呈阴险发作,肩部运动的垂直效率。目标。为了研究单独的关节内透明质酸(HA)给药是否优于常规疗法,并且对常规治疗的关节内给药的添加是改善AC患者的临床结果。方法。 PubMed,Embase,Cinahl和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库在2014年7月的情况下没有语言限制,具有先验定义的包含和排除标准。结果。本次审查中包含四项随机对照试验(273名参与者,278名肩部)。两次试验与常规治疗和2个试验进行了常规治疗的特性HA施用,以常规疗法的补充,评估了关节式的HA给药。 HA注射组中的疼痛和肩部功能/残疾结果不优于常规治疗组中达到的疼痛结果。在具有和无辅助HA管理的群体之间没有发现疼痛或肩部功能/残疾效果的显着差异。结论。单独的关节式HA管理不优于常规的AC处理,并且向常规疗法添加关节内的HA给药不能提供显着的增加的益处。应评估接受常规疗法的AC患者的HA管理,以避免不必要的医疗费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号