...
首页> 外文期刊>BioMed research international >Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Administration in Treating Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid Administration in Treating Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:透明质酸给药在治疗肩部黏膜囊炎中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction. Adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder presents with an insidious onset of pain and progressive limitation of shoulder movement.Objectives. To investigate whether intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) administration alone is superior to conventional therapies and whether the addition of intra-articular HA administration to conventional therapies improves clinical outcomes in patients with AC.Methods. The PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched without language restrictions in July 2014 witha prioridefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results. Four randomized controlled trials (273 participants, 278 shoulders) were included in this review. Two trials compared intra-articular HA administration with conventional therapies and 2 trials evaluated intra-articular HA administration as an addition to conventional therapies. Pain and shoulder function/disability outcomes in the HA injection group were not superior to those achieved in the conventional therapy groups. No significant differences in pain or shoulder function/disability outcomes were noted between the groups with and without adjunctive HA administration.Conclusions. Intra-articular HA administration alone is not superior to conventional AC treatments, and the addition of intra-articular HA administration to conventional therapies does not provide significant added benefits. HA administration in AC patients who are receiving conventional therapies should be evaluated to avoid unnecessary medical expenditure.
机译:介绍。肩关节囊膜炎(AC)表现为隐伏性疼痛发作和肩膀运动的进行性限制。研究单独使用关节内透明质酸(HA)是否优于常规疗法以及在常规疗法中添加关节内HA施用是否可改善AC患者的临床疗效。 2014年7月,在没有语言限制的情况下搜索了PubMed,EMBASE,CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆的电子数据库,并预先定义了包含和排除标准。该评价包括四项随机对照试验(273名参与者,278肩)。两项试验将关节内HA给药与常规治疗进行了比较,两项试验评估了关节内HA给药作为常规治疗的补充。 HA注射组的疼痛和肩部功能/残疾结局并不优于常规治疗组。在有或没有辅助性HA治疗的两组之间,疼痛或肩部功能/残疾结局均无显着差异。仅关节内HA给药并不优于常规AC治疗,并且向常规疗法中添加关节内HA给药未提供明显的额外益处。应评估接受常规疗法的AC患者的HA给药,以避免不必要的医疗费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号