首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Infection Control >A comparison of the antibacterial efficacy and cytotoxicity to cultured human skin cells of 7 commercial hand rubs and Xgel, a new copper-based biocidal hand rub.
【24h】

A comparison of the antibacterial efficacy and cytotoxicity to cultured human skin cells of 7 commercial hand rubs and Xgel, a new copper-based biocidal hand rub.

机译:比较7种市售手擦和Xgel(一种新的基于铜的杀菌手擦)对培养的人类皮肤细胞的抗菌功效和细胞毒性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Hand cleanliness is important in hospital infection control, but skin irritation from frequent alcohol-based hand rub use reduces compliance. We have compared a new copper biocide/Aloe vera-based biocidal hand rub (Xgel) with 7 commercially available hand rubs. METHODS: Hand rubs were cultured with human skin cells for 24 hours after which cytotoxicity was assessed using the sulforhodamine B assay. The EN 12054 bacterial suspension test protocol was used to assess biocidal activity of 2 of the least cytotoxic hand rubs (Xgel and Purell). RESULTS: Hand rubs had 50% cytotoxic concentrations ranging from >10% to <0.1% vol/vol. In the EN12054 assay, Xgel reduced colony forming units (CFU) by >10(8) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Acinetobacter in 1 minute, whereas Purell only reduced CFU by 10(4) and 10(5), respectively. Purell was ineffective against C difficile spores, whereas Xgel produced a 3 x 10(3) reduction in CFU. CONCLUSION: The hand rubs had a wide range of cytotoxicity values for human skin cells, with Xgel being the least cytotoxic to human skin cells. In the EN 12054 bacterial suspension test, Xgel was more effective than Purell against all organisms tested. It should be noted that these in vitro results may not translate into clinical differences.
机译:背景:手部清洁在医院感染控制中很重要,但是频繁使用酒精类手擦会刺激皮肤,从而降低依从性。我们将一种新型的基于铜杀菌剂/芦荟的杀菌手擦(Xgel)与7种市售手擦进行了比较。方法:将擦手液与人类皮肤细胞一起培养24小时,然后使用磺基罗丹明B检测评估细胞毒性。 EN 12054细菌悬浮液测试规程用于评估2种细胞毒性最小的手擦(Xgel和Purell)的杀生物活性。结果:手揉搓有50%的细胞毒性浓度,范围从> 10%到<0.1%vol / vol。在EN12054分析中,Xgel在1分钟内用耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和不动杆菌将菌落形成单位(CFU)降低了> 10(8),而Purell仅将CFU降低了10(4)和10(5),分别。 Purell对艰难梭菌孢子无效,而Xgel的CFU降低了3 x 10(3)。结论:手揉搓对人体皮肤细胞具有广泛的细胞毒性值,而Xgel对人体皮肤细胞的细胞毒性最小。在EN 12054细菌悬浮液测试中,Xgel对所有被测生物均比Purell更有效。应当指出,这些体外结果可能不会转化为临床差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号