...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of industrial medicine >Reliability of physical examination of the upper extremity among keyboard operators.
【24h】

Reliability of physical examination of the upper extremity among keyboard operators.

机译:键盘操作员上肢身体检查的可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Physical examination is a traditional outcome measure in epidemiological research. Its value as a reliable measure depends, in part, on the prevalence of positive findings. The purpose of this paper is to determine the empirical reliability of physical examination and anthropometry in a field study of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators. METHODS: Two experienced examiners independently performed common provocative tests and procedures in physical examinations of the neck and upper extremity among 160 keyboard operators. Two additional examiners conducted anthropometric surveys among 137 workers. Inter-examiner reliability was assessed with observed agreement, kappa statistics, and intra-class correlations (ICC). RESULTS: Observed agreement was between 96% and 100% for neck and upper extremity signs, muscle stretch reflexes, and muscle strength, however, with the exception of provocative tests, reliability statistics were unstable. Among the provocative tests, Phalen and Tinel tests had modest agreement after adjusting for chance (kappa range: 0.20-0.43). The carpal compression test had the best reliability (kappa=0.60 and kappa=0.67, left and right side, respectively). The ICCs for anthropometry ranged from 0.36-0.91. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the study showed that statistically, except for the carpal compression test, physical examination contributed minimal reliable information. This was attributed mainly to the low prevalence of positive findings, and generally mild nature of upper extremity disorders in this population. The results are the best estimate of what would be found in a field study with experienced examiners. While it may reduce bias, separating physical examination from medical history may contribute to the poor reliability of findings. With a shift toward reliable measures, resources can be allocated to more effective tools, like questionnaires, in epidemiological research of upper extremity disorders among keyboard operators. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:背景:体格检查是流行病学研究中的一项传统成果指标。它作为一种可靠措施的价值部分取决于积极发现的普遍性。本文的目的是确定对键盘操作员进行的上肢疾病现场研究的体格检查和人体测量学的经验可靠性。方法:两名经验丰富的检查员在160名键盘操作员的颈部和上肢体格检查中独立进行了常见的刺激性测试和程序。另外两名检查员对137名工人进行了人体测量学调查。考官间的可靠性通过观察到的一致性,kappa统计量和组内相关性(ICC)进行评估。结果:观察到的颈部和上肢体征,肌肉拉伸反射和肌肉力量的一致性在96%和100%之间,但是,除了刺激性测试外,可靠性统计数据不稳定。在挑衅性测试中,Phalen和Tinel测试在调整机会后的适度一致性(kappa范围:0.20-0.43)。腕骨压缩测试具有最佳可靠性(左侧和右侧分别为kappa = 0.60和kappa = 0.67)。人体测量的ICC范围为0.36-0.91。结论:该研究结果表明,统计学上,除了腕骨压力试验以外,身体检查几乎没有提供可靠的信息。这主要归因于阳性结果的低患病率,以及该人群中上肢疾病的一般性。结果是对有经验的审查员进行的实地研究的发现的最佳估计。虽然可以减少偏见,但将体格检查与病史分开可能会导致结果可靠性差。随着向可靠措施的转变,可以将资源分配给更有效的工具,例如问卷调查表,以进行键盘操作员上肢疾病的流行病学研究。版权所有2000 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号