...
首页> 外文期刊>Ageing Research Reviews >Enteral nutritional support in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
【24h】

Enteral nutritional support in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机译:肠营养支持在预防和治疗压疮中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: There have been few systematic reviews and no meta-analyses of the clinical benefits of nutritional support in patients with, or at risk of developing, pressure ulcers. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to address the impact of enteral nutritional support on pressure ulcer incidence and healing and a range of other clinically relevant outcome measures in this group. METHODS: Fifteen studies (including eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) or enteral tube feeding (ETF), identified using electronic databases (including Pub Med and Cochrane) and bibliography searches, were included in the systematic review. Outcomes including pressure ulcer incidence, pressure ulcer healing, quality of life, complications, mortality, anthropometry and dietary intake were recorded, with the aim of comparing nutritional support versus routine care (e.g. usual diet and pressure ulcer care) and nutritional formulas of different composition. Of these 15 studies, 5 RCTs comparing ONS (4 RCTs) and ETF (1 RCT) with routine care could be included in a meta-analysis of pressure ulcer incidence. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed that ONS (250-500 kcal, 2-26 weeks) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcer development in at-risk patients compared to routine care (odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.89, 4 RCTs, n=1224, elderly, post-surgical, chronically hospitalised patients). Similar results were obtained when a combined meta-analysis of ONS (4 RCT) and ETF (1 RCT) trials was performed (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, 5 RCTs, n=1325). Individual studies showed a trend towards improved healing of existing pressure ulcers with disease-specific (including high protein) versus standard formulas, although robust RCTs are required to confirm this. Although some studies indicate that total nutritional intake is improved, data on other outcome measures (quality of life) are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows enteral nutritional support, particularly high protein ONS, can significantly reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcers (by 25%). Although studies suggest ONS and ETF may improve healing of PU, further research to confirm this trend is required.
机译:背景:对于有压力性溃疡或有发展性溃疡风险的患者,对营养支持的临床益处的系统评价很少,也没有荟萃分析。因此,进行了这项系统的综述和荟萃分析,以探讨肠内营养支持对压力性溃疡发生和愈合的影响以及该组中其他一系列临床相关结果指标。方法:系统评价纳入了十五项研究(包括八项随机对照试验(RCT)),这些研究通过电子数据库(包括Pub Med和Cochrane)和书目搜索进行了鉴定,涉及口服营养补充剂(ONS)或肠管饲喂(ETF)。 。记录结果,包括压疮的发生率,压疮的愈合,生活质量,并发症,死亡率,人体测量学和饮食摄入量,目的是比较营养支持与常规护理(例如常规饮食和压疮护理)以及不同组成的营养配方。在这15项研究中,将ONS(4个RCT)和ETF(1个RCT)与常规护理进行比较的5个RCT可纳入压力性溃疡发病率的荟萃分析。结果:荟萃分析显示,与常规护理相比,高危患者中ONS(250-500 kcal,2-26周)与压疮发展的发生率显着降低(几率0.75,95%CI 0.62-0.89) ,4个RCT(n = 1224),老年,手术后,长期住院的患者)。当进行ONS(4 RCT)和ETF(1 RCT)试验的组合荟萃分析时,获得了相似的结果(OR 0.74,95%CI 0.62-0.88,5 RCT,n = 1325)。个别研究表明,与疾病病因(包括高蛋白)相比,与标准配方相比,现有压力性溃疡的愈合有所改善,尽管需要强有力的RCT来证实。尽管一些研究表明总营养摄入量得到了改善,但缺乏其他结果指标(生活质量)的数据。结论:该系统评价显示肠内营养支持,尤其是高蛋白ONS,可显着降低发生压疮的风险(降低25%)。尽管研究表明ONS和ETF可能会改善PU的愈合,但需要进一步研究以确认这种趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号