首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Alterations in forearm vascular reactivity in patients with septic shock.
【24h】

Alterations in forearm vascular reactivity in patients with septic shock.

机译:败血性休克患者前臂血管反应性改变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with septic shock are haemodynamically unstable and suffer from vasodilation. Studying the human forearm vascular bed in patients with septic shock, we tested the hypothesis that the responses to regionally infused endothelium-(in)dependent vasodilators and vasoconstrictors are uniformly impaired. Forearm blood flow (FBF, venous occlusion plethysmography) and brachial arterial pressure were determined to calculate forearm vascular resistance (FVR) in eight consecutive sedated, mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock (APACHE II Score range 21-34, SOFA Score 11-16) and 11 healthy volunteers. Despite increased baseline FBF in patients with septic shock (6.1 (SD 1.5) ml x min(-1) x (100 ml of tissue)(-1) compared to 4.7 (1.4) in volunteers) the significant decreases in FVR seen in response to exogenous nitric oxide (nitroprusside) and acetylcholine did not differ between groups. However, compared to volunteers, mitigation of endogenous nitric oxide production by a low dose of N(G)-methyl-L-arginine acetate (L-NMMA) caused a significant increase (+6.7 mmHg x min x ml(-1)) in septic patients. Regional vasoconstriction in response to phenylephrine (FVR: +9.9 vs +30.7 mmHg x min x ml(-1) in controls) and angiotensin II (FVR: +9.0 vs +67.4 mmHg x min x ml(-1)) was markedly impaired. In contrast, vasopressin, in dosages evoking no vasoconstriction in volunteers, induced a significant increase in FVR in septic patients (+10.0 mmHg x min x ml(-1)). In the forearm of patients with septic shock, vasoconstriction by alpha1- and angiotensin II receptor agonists is selectively impaired, whereas the vasoconstrictor response to vasopressin is exaggerated. These findings exclude a generalised impairment of vasomotor activity in patients with septic shock and provide a rationale for vasopressin administration.
机译:败血性休克患者血液动力学不稳定且患有血管舒张。通过研究败血性休克患者的前臂血管床,我们测试了以下假设:对局部注入的内皮依赖性血管扩张剂和血管收缩剂的反应均受到损害。确定前八名镇静,机械通气的感染性休克患者的前臂血流量(FBF,静脉阻塞体积描记法)和肱动脉压,以计算前臂血管阻力(FVR)(APACHE II评分范围21-34,SOFA评分11-16)和11名健康志愿者。尽管感染性休克患者的基线FBF有所增加(6.1(SD 1.5)ml x min(-1)x(100 ml组织)(-1),而志愿者中的4.7(1.4)与之相比,FVR明显降低组间外源性一氧化氮(硝基普鲁糖苷)和乙酰胆碱的含量没有差异。但是,与志愿者相比,低剂量的N(G)-甲基-L-精氨酸乙酸酯(L-NMMA)减轻了内源性一氧化氮的产生,导致显着增加(+6.7 mmHg x min x ml(-1))在败血病患者中。响应去氧肾上腺素的局部血管收缩(FVR:对照组为+9.9 vs +30.7 mmHg x min x ml(-1))和血管紧张素II(FVR:为+9.0 vs +67.4 mmHg x min x ml(-1))明显受损。 。相反,加压素的剂量在志愿者中不引起血管收缩,在败血症患者中引起FVR显着增加(+10.0 mmHg x min x ml(-1))。在败血性休克患者的前臂中,α1-和血管紧张素II受体激动剂的血管收缩选择性受损,而对血管加压素的血管收缩反应却被夸大了。这些发现排除了败血性休克患者血管舒缩功能的普遍损害,并为血管加压素的给药提供了依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号