...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of otolaryngology >Lidocaine spray vs tetracaine solution for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy.
【24h】

Lidocaine spray vs tetracaine solution for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy.

机译:利多卡因喷雾剂与丁卡因溶液用于经鼻光纤喉镜检查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine spray 10%, compared with tetracaine 2% solution, as a local anesthetic for patients undergoing transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy. METHOD OF STUDY: A prospective study was conducted on patients undergoing transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy. Microsurgical sponges were applied in each side of the nose for 10 minutes before laryngoscopy. Patients were randomly classified into group A and group B, in which tetracaine 2% solution and lidocaine spray 10% were used, respectively. Patients were asked to evaluate the severity of pain during the procedure by a visual analog scale. Patients data, pain score, and potential complications were placed in a database and statistically assessed. MAIN RESULTS: Our series consisted of 48 patients. Statistical analysis showed significant lower mean nasal discomfort score in favor of the tetracaine group (2.29 vs 3.04 [P < .001]). No tetracaine complications or side effects occurred. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION: Neurosurgical sponge application of tetracaine 2% solution is an easy, safe, inexpensive, and effective analgesia for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy.
机译:问题陈述:本研究的目的是评估经鼻鼻咽喉镜检查的患者,与丁卡因2%溶液相比,利多卡因喷雾剂10%的局部麻醉效果。研究方法:对接受经鼻纤维喉镜检查的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。喉镜检查前,在鼻子的每一侧应用显微外科海绵10分钟。将患者随机分为A组和B组,分别使用丁卡因2%溶液和利多卡因喷雾10%。要求患者通过视觉模拟量表评估手术过程中的疼痛严重程度。将患者数据,疼痛评分和潜在并发症纳入数据库并进行统计学评估。主要结果:我们的系列包括48例患者。统计分析表明,丁卡因组的平均鼻部不适评分明显较低(2.29 vs 3.04 [P <.001])。没有丁卡因并发症或副作用发生。结论:神经外科海绵应用丁卡因2%溶液对于经鼻光纤喉镜检查是一种简单,安全,廉价且有效的镇痛方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号