...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.
【24h】

A comparison of different treatment techniques for posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition.

机译:混合牙列中后牙咬合的不同治疗技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this retrospective investigation, the changes occurring during the treatment of patients with posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition with the use of expansion plate and quad-helix appliances were evaluated and compared with those resulting from growth and development occurring in a control group of patients of similar age and type of malocclusion. The expansion plate group consisted of 13 patients, the quad-helix group of 14 patients, and the control group consisted of 10 children with transverse posterior crossbites in the mixed dentition. The research material was formed from orthodontic models and lateral and frontal cephalometric radiographs from 37 children. It was observed in this investigation that transverse expansion is achieved by both the expansion plate and quad-helix appliances. However, the average period of treatment was 1.2 years for the expansion plate, and 0.6 years for the quad-helix appliance. Although posterior crossbite was corrected in a fairly short period of time, the quad helix appliance caused considerable buccal tipping of the maxillary first permanent molars.
机译:在这项回顾性研究中,评估了在使用扩展板和四螺旋矫治器治疗混合牙列中后牙合牙合患者的过程中发生的变化,并将其与对照组患者的生长发育所产生的变化进行了比较。年龄和错牙合类型相似。扩展板组由13例患者组成,四螺旋组由14例患者组成,对照组由10例儿童在混合牙列中具有横向后交叉咬合。研究材料是从37位儿童的正畸模型以及侧面和额头X线片上得出的。在这项调查中观察到,通过扩展板和四螺旋装置均实现了横向扩展。但是,膨胀板的平均治疗期为1.2年,四螺旋装置的平均治疗期为0.6年。尽管后交叉咬伤在相当短的时间内得到了纠正,但四螺旋矫治器在上颌第一恒磨牙上引起了颊侧倾翻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号