...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics >Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
【24h】

Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.

机译:亚洲男性错牙合严重程度与错牙合类型和正畸治疗需求有关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to assess the severity of malocclusion in young Asian men in relation to types of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need. METHODS: Study models of 339 male army recruits (age, 17-22 years) with no history of orthodontic treatment were assessed. The peer assessment rating (PAR) index was used to determine the severity of their malocclusions. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were performed to evaluate the PAR index in relation to treatment need assessed by the dental health component (DHC) and the esthetic component (EC) of the index of orthodontic treatment need. RESULTS: The mean PAR scores were 17, 20, 28, and 18 for Class I, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III, respectively. PAR scores were highly correlated with DHC and EC scores (P < .001). An increase of 1 point in the PAR score significantly increased the likelihood of orthodontic treatment need for dental-health reasons or esthetic impairment (by 1.17 times [95% CI 1.13-1.21] or 1.25 times [95% CI 1.19-1.31]). The areas under the ROC curves for PAR index were 84% and 94% for the DHC and EC assessments, respectively, suggesting that PAR scores were better predicators of esthetic than dental health impairment for assessing Asian malocclusions. The optimum cutoff points were PAR scores of 17 and 20 for dental health and esthetic impairment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Class II malocclusions were more severe than Class I or III in Asian men. Malocclusions with definite treatment need had PAR scores that were significantly greater than those with borderline, little, or no need. ROC curves showed that the PAR index had an acceptable level of validity with the professional assessment of orthodontic treatment need in Asian malocclusions. The optimum cutoff PAR scores were 17 and 20 in relation to DHC and EC assessment, respectively. The PAR index was more predictive of esthetic than dental health need.
机译:简介:这项研究的目的是评估与年轻女性的错牙合畸形类型和正畸治疗需求相关的亚洲年轻男性的错牙合畸形的严重程度。方法:评估了没有正畸治疗史的339名男性新兵(年龄17至22岁)的研究模型。同伴评估等级(PAR)指数用于确定其错牙合的严重程度。进行逻辑回归和接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线,以评估与牙齿需求量相关的PAR指数,该指数由正畸治疗需求指数的牙齿健康成分(DHC)和美学成分(EC)评估。结果:I级,II级1、2级,2级和III级的平均PAR得分分别为17、20、28和18。 PAR评分与DHC和EC评分高度相关(P <.001)。 PAR得分增加1分会显着增加出于牙齿健康原因或审美受损而需要正畸治疗的可能性(增加1.17倍[95%CI 1.13-1.21]或1.25倍[95%CI 1.19-1.31])。在DHC和EC评估中,PAR指数的ROC曲线下面积分别为84%和94%,这表明,在评估亚洲错牙合畸形时,PAR评分比牙齿健康障碍更好地代表了审美方面的判断力。最佳的临界点分别是牙齿健康和审美受损的PAR分数为17和20。结论:亚洲男性中II类错牙合比I类或III类严重。有明确治疗需要的咬合不全患者的PAR得分明显高于有边缘性,很少或不需要的患者。 ROC曲线显示,对于亚洲错牙合畸形患者的正畸治疗需求的专业评估,PAR指数具有可接受的有效性水平。相对于DHC和EC评估,最佳截止PAR分数分别为17和20。 PAR指数比牙齿健康需要更能预测审美。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号