首页> 外文期刊>ALFA Lotfeeding >Climate change/CPRS developments
【24h】

Climate change/CPRS developments

机译:气候变化/ CPRS发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (GPRS) Bill having entered the Senate on November 17 and Opposition hopes for a delay in lieu of an outcome at Copenhagen fading, the politics surrounding the scheme is likely to come to a head. The announcement by the Federal Government that agriculture would be permanently excluded from the GPRS is consistent with ALFA policy and an encouraging step. However, it nevertheless should be placed in context. While it addresses the difficulty of aligning the vagaries of agriculture with a cap and trade scheme, it does not mean that agriculture will escape paying a carbon price for its emissions. In fact, Senator Penny Wong has flagged that other regulatory measurers will be imposed on the sector to reduce its emissions. This is consistent with the Garnaut White Paper from earlier in the year. Such alternatives could be a carbon or consumption tax or other measures such as licencing.
机译:随着《减少碳污染计划》(GPRS)法案于11月17日进入参议院,并且反对党希望推迟代替哥本哈根会议的结果,该计划周围的政治可能会陷入僵局。联邦政府宣布将农业永久排除在GPRS之外,这与ALFA政策是一致的,也是令人鼓舞的一步。但是,它仍应放在上下文中。尽管它解决了将农业变数与上限和贸易计划相结合的难题,但这并不意味着农业将为碳排放量而付出碳价。实际上,参议员黄佩妮(Penny Wong)曾表示,将对该行业施加其他监管措施以减少其排放。这与今年早些时候的Garnaut白皮书一致。这样的选择可以是碳税或消费税或其他措施,例如许可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号