首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Science >LATE CENOZOIC UPLIFT OF THE SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GEOMORPHIC EVIDENCE
【24h】

LATE CENOZOIC UPLIFT OF THE SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GEOMORPHIC EVIDENCE

机译:加利福尼亚塞拉内华达晚新生代隆升?地貌证据的批判性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From the earliest days of California geology, the ramp-like profile of the northern half of the Sierra Nevada mountains and putative signs of recent incision have been interpreted as evidence that the range was formed by the tilting of a rigid block in the late Cenozoic. Over the years, various geomorphic analyses have been used to quantify the magnitude of uplift and to establish its timing, such as analyzing the gradients of ancient channels, examining the tilt of sedimentary beds, and reconstructing the incisional history of rivers. Most studies that have used these methods have supported substantial (>500 m) recent uplift of the Sierra. In contrast, investigations based on other sources of paleotopographic information, such as isotope records, thermochronology, and detrital zircon geochronology, have found that the Sierra have been at high elevations for much of the Cenozoic. This set of contradictory results motivates a re-examination of the geomorphic evidence for late Cenozoic uplift. A critical assessment of these geomorphic studies, based on new topographic analyses and field investigations, reveals that their conclusions are not well supported. For example, several studies based their results on reconstructions of ancient channels that would have flowed up and over bedrock ridges as high as 190 m, a physical impossibility. Other weaknesses include unjustified assumptions regarding the original tilt of fluvial deposits, misinterpretations of stratigraphic relationships, and inadequate recognition of the effect of lithology on channel profiles. The studies supporting recent tilting in the northern Sierra Nevada are inconclusive and rely on observations not unique to tectonic forcing. Indeed, much of the evidence based on the paleogradients of the Tertiary channels is consistent with an early trellis drainage network formed across alternating bands of resistant and weak lithologies. In addition, analyses are presented to demonstrate that deep northern Sierran canyons thought to have been recently incised were, instead, cut as early as the Eocene-Oligocene. Two geomorphic studies from the southern Sierra are consistent with late Cenozoic tilting and uplift although ongoing tectonic activity may be insignificant. Finally, I present a conceptual model of the evolution of the Sierran landscape, applicable primarily to the northern half of the range, illustrating the development of three different drainage networks since the late Jurassic.
机译:从加利福尼亚地质学的早期开始,内华达山脉北部的斜坡状轮廓和最近的切入迹象被认为是该范围是由新生代晚期刚性块体倾斜形成的证据。多年来,各种地貌分析已用于量化隆起的幅度并确定隆起的时间,例如分析古河道的坡度,检查沉积床的倾斜度以及重建河流的切入历史。大多数使用这些方法的研究都支持最近塞拉山脉的隆升(> 500 m)。相比之下,根据其他古地形信息源(例如同位素记录,热年代学和碎屑锆石年代学)进行的调查发现,塞拉山脉的大部分新生代都处于高海拔。这组相互矛盾的结果促使人们重新审查晚新生代隆升的地貌证据。根据新的地形分析和现场调查,对这些地貌研究进行了严格的评估,结果表明,他们的结论没有得到很好的支持。例如,一些研究的结果基于古老通道的重建,这些通道本来就不可能流过高达190 m的基岩山脊。其他缺点包括关于河流沉积物原始倾斜的不合理假设,对地层关系的错误解释以及对岩性对通道剖面影响的认识不足。支持内华达山脉北部近期倾斜的研究尚无定论,并依赖于构造强迫并非唯一的观测结果。确实,许多基于第三纪河道的古梯度的证据与在电阻性和弱岩性交替带上形成的早期网格排水网相一致。另外,分析结果表明,据信最近被切开的北部塞拉然峡谷早在始新世-渐新世就被切割了。尽管正在进行的构造活动可能微不足道,但来自塞拉南部的两项地貌研究与新生代晚期倾斜和隆升一致。最后,我提出了Sierran景观演变的概念模型,主要适用于山脉的北部,说明了侏罗纪晚期以来三种不同排水网络的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号